Association for Clinical Genomic Science (ACGS) guidelines for the classification of oncogenicity of somatic variants in cancer: recommendations by the UK somatic variant interpretation group (SVIG-UK)

Comprehensive genomic testing in routine cancer care pathways has created the need to interpret the consequences of somatic (acquired) genomic variants beyond the currently well-characterised driver variants in cancer gene hotspots. While several guidelines have been published to determine the oncogenicity of somatic cancer gene variants, they lack a comprehensive and flexible approach that encompasses all available lines of evidence. Individual UK laboratories have developed local approaches to standardise somatic variant interpretation, often based on different sets of published guidelines, but a comprehensive national standardised framework is lacking. The absence of standardisation in approaches to somatic variant interpretation highlights a significant gap in the field of genomic medicine within the UK healthcare system. Key stakeholders from across the UK cancer genomics diagnostic community formed the UK Somatic Variant Interpretation Group (SVIG-UK) in September 2018 to develop a consensus approach for interpretation of somatic variants identified through genomic testing in patients with solid tumours and haematological malignancies. SVIG-UK scientists conducted a review of existing somatic variant interpretation classification systems and although they mostly agreed on evidence sources for variant interpretation, differences were identified in how the evidence should be used, weighted and combined. The SVIG-UK team subsequently developed a single, standardised UK-wide approach to somatic variant interpretation which encompassed both solid tumour and haematological cancer genomic testing. This framework was shared with stakeholders across the UK alongside variants for preliminary testing. Outcomes were then reviewed and following engagement sessions across the community, the variant interpretation recommendations were updated and ratified by the UK Association of Clinical Genomics Sciences. We present herein the SVIG-UK framework and recommendations, which provide a standardised, comprehensive and flexible approach for classifying the oncogenicity of somatic variants in cancer genes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Genetics
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2025-111046
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association for Clinical Genomic Science (ACGS) guidelines for the classification of oncogenicity of somatic variants in cancer: recommendations by the UK somatic variant interpretation group (SVIG-UK)

Joanne Mason, Kevin C. Baker, K Moloney, Ashley Cartwright et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medical Genetics
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
0.94
article

Association for Clinical Genomic Science (ACGS) guidelines for the classification of oncogenicity of somatic variants in cancer: recommendations by the UK somatic variant interpretation group (SVIG-UK)

Joanne Mason, Kevin C. Baker, K Moloney, Ashley Cartwright, Siân Lewis, Claire McKeeve, Debbie Travis, Kirsty Russell, George J. Burghel, Ana M. Brás-Goldberg, Jonathan D. Williams, Christopher Wragg, Suzanne MacMahon, Jennifer A. Fairley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Comprehensive genomic testing in routine cancer care pathways has created the need to interpret the consequences of somatic (acquired) genomic variants beyond the currently well-characterised driver variants in cancer gene hotspots. While several guidelines have been published to determine the oncogenicity of somatic cancer gene variants, they lack a comprehensive and flexible approach that encompasses all available lines of evidence. Individual UK laboratories have developed local approaches to standardise somatic variant interpretation, often based on different sets of published guidelines, but a comprehensive national standardised framework is lacking. The absence of standardisation in approaches to somatic variant interpretation highlights a significant gap in the field of genomic medicine within the UK healthcare system. Key stakeholders from across the UK cancer genomics diagnostic community formed the UK Somatic Variant Interpretation Group (SVIG-UK) in September 2018 to develop a consensus approach for interpretation of somatic variants identified through genomic testing in patients with solid tumours and haematological malignancies. SVIG-UK scientists conducted a review of existing somatic variant interpretation classification systems and although they mostly agreed on evidence sources for variant interpretation, differences were identified in how the evidence should be used, weighted and combined. The SVIG-UK team subsequently developed a single, standardised UK-wide approach to somatic variant interpretation which encompassed both solid tumour and haematological cancer genomic testing. This framework was shared with stakeholders across the UK alongside variants for preliminary testing. Outcomes were then reviewed and following engagement sessions across the community, the variant interpretation recommendations were updated and ratified by the UK Association of Clinical Genomics Sciences. We present herein the SVIG-UK framework and recommendations, which provide a standardised, comprehensive and flexible approach for classifying the oncogenicity of somatic variants in cancer genes.

Journal of Medical GeneticsVol. 63(3)
North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Genomics England (GB), Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Oxford Fertility (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.