Analysis and reformulation of the <i>k</i> –ω turbulence model for buoyancy-driven thermal convection

The representation of buoyancy-driven turbulence in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes models remains unresolved, with no widely accepted standard formulation. A key difficulty is the lack of analytical guidance for incorporating buoyant effects, particularly under unstable stratification. This study derives an analytical solution of the standard k–ω model for Rayleigh–Bénard convection in an infinite layer, where turbulent kinetic energy is generated solely by buoyancy. The solution provides explicit scaling relations among the Rayleigh (Ra), Prandtl (Pr), and Nusselt (Nu) numbers that capture the simulation trends: Nu∼Ra1/3Pr1/3 for Pr≪1 and Nu∼Ra1/3Pr−0.415 for Pr≫1. This framework quantifies the discrepancies in the conventional buoyancy treatment and clarifies their origin. Informed by this analysis, the buoyancy-related modeling terms are reformulated to recover the measured trends: namely Nu∼Pr1/8 for Pr≪1 and Nu∼Pr0 for Pr≫1 at moderate Ra. Only two dimensionless algebraic functions are introduced, which vanish in the absence of buoyancy, ensuring full compatibility with the standard closure. The corrected model is validated across a range of buoyancy-driven flows, including two-dimensional Rayleigh–Bénard convection, internally heated convection in two configurations, unstably stratified Couette flow, and vertically heated natural convection with varying aspect ratios. Across all cases, the corrected model provides significantly improved predictions of mean temperature fields and turbulent heat flux distributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0323889
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis and reformulation of the k –ω turbulence model for buoyancy-driven thermal convection

Da-Sol Joo
Physics of Fluids
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
article

Analysis and reformulation of the k –ω turbulence model for buoyancy-driven thermal convection

Da-Sol Joo
article en

Abstract

The representation of buoyancy-driven turbulence in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes models remains unresolved, with no widely accepted standard formulation. A key difficulty is the lack of analytical guidance for incorporating buoyant effects, particularly under unstable stratification. This study derives an analytical solution of the standard k–ω model for Rayleigh–Bénard convection in an infinite layer, where turbulent kinetic energy is generated solely by buoyancy. The solution provides explicit scaling relations among the Rayleigh (Ra), Prandtl (Pr), and Nusselt (Nu) numbers that capture the simulation trends: Nu∼Ra1/3Pr1/3 for Pr≪1 and Nu∼Ra1/3Pr−0.415 for Pr≫1. This framework quantifies the discrepancies in the conventional buoyancy treatment and clarifies their origin. Informed by this analysis, the buoyancy-related modeling terms are reformulated to recover the measured trends: namely Nu∼Pr1/8 for Pr≪1 and Nu∼Pr0 for Pr≫1 at moderate Ra. Only two dimensionless algebraic functions are introduced, which vanish in the absence of buoyancy, ensuring full compatibility with the standard closure. The corrected model is validated across a range of buoyancy-driven flows, including two-dimensional Rayleigh–Bénard convection, internally heated convection in two configurations, unstably stratified Couette flow, and vertically heated natural convection with varying aspect ratios. Across all cases, the corrected model provides significantly improved predictions of mean temperature fields and turbulent heat flux distributions.

Physics of FluidsVol. 38(4)
Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.