Comparative evaluation of the material consumption and carbon footprint of silicon PV modules

<h2>Summary</h2> This study provides a comparative evaluation of the material consumption and carbon footprint of silicon photovoltaic (PV) modules. Utilizing 71 environmental product declaration (EPD) reports from 23 solar panel manufacturers, covering over 220 modules, the assessment focuses on greenhouse gas emissions and material demands across different cell technologies—including passivated emitter and rear contact (PERC), tunneling oxide passivated contact (TOPCon), silicon heterojunction (SHJ), and back contact (BC)—and module types, comparing monofacial and bifacial. Moreover, steel and aluminum frames are compared. Results indicate significant global-warming potential (GWP) and embodied energy (EE) variations among different technologies. Notably, steel-framed modules demonstrate lower GWP despite a higher weight per watt peak (Wp). The study highlights the need for standardized functional units in EPD reports to facilitate fair comparisons and the importance of considering material sustainability and recycling in PV manufacturing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Sustainability
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100576
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of the material consumption and carbon footprint of silicon PV modules

Nathan Chang, Brett Hallam, Moonyong Kim, Sisi Wang et al.
Cell Reports Sustainability
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
article

Comparative evaluation of the material consumption and carbon footprint of silicon PV modules

Nathan Chang, Brett Hallam, Moonyong Kim, Sisi Wang, Catherine Chan, Lijun Wang
article en

Abstract

<h2>Summary</h2> This study provides a comparative evaluation of the material consumption and carbon footprint of silicon photovoltaic (PV) modules. Utilizing 71 environmental product declaration (EPD) reports from 23 solar panel manufacturers, covering over 220 modules, the assessment focuses on greenhouse gas emissions and material demands across different cell technologies—including passivated emitter and rear contact (PERC), tunneling oxide passivated contact (TOPCon), silicon heterojunction (SHJ), and back contact (BC)—and module types, comparing monofacial and bifacial. Moreover, steel and aluminum frames are compared. Results indicate significant global-warming potential (GWP) and embodied energy (EE) variations among different technologies. Notably, steel-framed modules demonstrate lower GWP despite a higher weight per watt peak (Wp). The study highlights the need for standardized functional units in EPD reports to facilitate fair comparisons and the importance of considering material sustainability and recycling in PV manufacturing.

Cell Reports SustainabilityVol. 3(2)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of the material consumption and carbon footprint of silicon PV modules — Nathan Chang, Brett Hallam, et al. · Cell Reports Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS