Material circularity in the UK’s foundation industries

As the UK advances toward its 2050 net-zero target, moving beyond energy efficiency to comprehensive resource management is essential. This study evaluates how circular economy principles can reshape the use of aluminium, lead, steel, glass, and paper in the UK's foundation industries. Using a circularity index, we assess current performance and identify improvement pathways, quantifying the potential of enhanced recycling and material reuse. Results show that circularity strategies alone could reduce emissions by 42% and energy use by 17%, with reductions rising to 69% and 56% respectively, when combined with best-practice energy intensities. While aluminium and steel offer the largest gains, barriers remain for lead, glass, and paper due to technical and quality constraints. These findings highlight the opportunities and the complexities of industrial circularity, providing evidence to guide policymakers and industry leaders in accelerating the transition to a more sustainable and resource-efficient economy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108728
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Material circularity in the UK’s foundation industries

Rossitza Setchi, Natanael Bolson, Jonathan M. Cullen, Masoud Ahmadinia et al.
2 citations
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
4.45
article

Material circularity in the UK’s foundation industries

Rossitza Setchi, Natanael Bolson, Jonathan M. Cullen, Masoud Ahmadinia, Sam Evans
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As the UK advances toward its 2050 net-zero target, moving beyond energy efficiency to comprehensive resource management is essential. This study evaluates how circular economy principles can reshape the use of aluminium, lead, steel, glass, and paper in the UK's foundation industries. Using a circularity index, we assess current performance and identify improvement pathways, quantifying the potential of enhanced recycling and material reuse. Results show that circularity strategies alone could reduce emissions by 42% and energy use by 17%, with reductions rising to 69% and 56% respectively, when combined with best-practice energy intensities. While aluminium and steel offer the largest gains, barriers remain for lead, glass, and paper due to technical and quality constraints. These findings highlight the opportunities and the complexities of industrial circularity, providing evidence to guide policymakers and industry leaders in accelerating the transition to a more sustainable and resource-efficient economy.

Resources Conservation and RecyclingVol. 227
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Material circularity in the UK’s foundation industries — Rossitza Setchi, Natanael Bolson, et al. · Resources Conservation and Recycling (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS