Spatial Constraints and User Adaptation: A Mixed-Methods Study of High-Density Students Dormitories

This study employs a mixed-methods approach to investigate the current use and evolving needs of dormitory environments through a cross-analysis of existing research and user experience. A two-phased PRISMA-guided systematic literature review for both global and China-based content was conducted, which was then linked to an examination of eight high-density dormitory spaces in Shanghai. The case studies were analyzed using qualitative content analysis methods, incorporating both spatial analysis and netnography to provide a comprehensive understanding of dormitory use. The cross-analysis highlights a persistent design–use gap: efficiency-driven layouts underdeliver on privacy and comfort, prompting compensatory user modifications. Findings also reveal that most rooms fell below suggested standards; circulation was mainly limited to a single central aisle with no entrance buffer, constraining flexibility and privacy. Students responded to these limitations with small-scale personalization, such as bed curtains, mattress toppers, chair swaps, lighting, and storage hacks, to mitigate acoustic/visual exposure and comfort deficits. With the rising demand for dormitories and based on these insights, we identified three critical dimensions for future dormitory design: privacy, equity, and personalization. These findings underscore that current designs fail to fully satisfy even basic functional requirements, making it essential to develop strategies that respond to evolving needs and integrate considerations of well-being, comfort, and user autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234330
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Constraints and User Adaptation: A Mixed-Methods Study of High-Density Students Dormitories

Demet Dinçer, Xinyu Song
2 citations
Buildings
Facilities and Workplace Management
4.88
article

Spatial Constraints and User Adaptation: A Mixed-Methods Study of High-Density Students Dormitories

Demet Dinçer, Xinyu Song
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study employs a mixed-methods approach to investigate the current use and evolving needs of dormitory environments through a cross-analysis of existing research and user experience. A two-phased PRISMA-guided systematic literature review for both global and China-based content was conducted, which was then linked to an examination of eight high-density dormitory spaces in Shanghai. The case studies were analyzed using qualitative content analysis methods, incorporating both spatial analysis and netnography to provide a comprehensive understanding of dormitory use. The cross-analysis highlights a persistent design–use gap: efficiency-driven layouts underdeliver on privacy and comfort, prompting compensatory user modifications. Findings also reveal that most rooms fell below suggested standards; circulation was mainly limited to a single central aisle with no entrance buffer, constraining flexibility and privacy. Students responded to these limitations with small-scale personalization, such as bed curtains, mattress toppers, chair swaps, lighting, and storage hacks, to mitigate acoustic/visual exposure and comfort deficits. With the rising demand for dormitories and based on these insights, we identified three critical dimensions for future dormitory design: privacy, equity, and personalization. These findings underscore that current designs fail to fully satisfy even basic functional requirements, making it essential to develop strategies that respond to evolving needs and integrate considerations of well-being, comfort, and user autonomy.

BuildingsVol. 15(23)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Facilities and Workplace Management
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.