All-Age-Friendly Streets in Chinese and International Research: A Bibliometric and Comparative Review (1994–2024)

Streets are vital socio-spatial infrastructures that shape mobility, well-being, and social inclusion across age groups. This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric and comparative review of all-age-friendly street walkability research in the Chinese (CNKI) and English (Web of Science) literature from 1994 to 2024. Using CiteSpace for keyword co-occurrence, clustering, and burst detection, 204 publications were analyzed to map thematic evolution and methodological trends. Results reveal a persistent elderly-oriented bias and fragmented cross-scale integration, with international studies demonstrating earlier theoretical maturity and multi-scalar analytical models, while Chinese research advances in streetscape image analysis, VR simulations, and perception-based designs. Despite their differing trajectories, both studies converge on the shared goal of enhancing walkability, health, and urban livability. This review highlights key research gaps—particularly intergenerational assessment frameworks, explainable analytics, and policy translation—and proposes pathways toward integrating design, planning, and governance to promote all-age-friendly streets worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234336
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

All-Age-Friendly Streets in Chinese and International Research: A Bibliometric and Comparative Review (1994–2024)

Marcus White, Xiaoran Huang, Tianyi Yang, Xuewei Guan et al.
1 citations
Buildings
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.18
article

All-Age-Friendly Streets in Chinese and International Research: A Bibliometric and Comparative Review (1994–2024)

Marcus White, Xiaoran Huang, Tianyi Yang, Xuewei Guan, Yan Wang, Bo Zhang, Xin Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Streets are vital socio-spatial infrastructures that shape mobility, well-being, and social inclusion across age groups. This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric and comparative review of all-age-friendly street walkability research in the Chinese (CNKI) and English (Web of Science) literature from 1994 to 2024. Using CiteSpace for keyword co-occurrence, clustering, and burst detection, 204 publications were analyzed to map thematic evolution and methodological trends. Results reveal a persistent elderly-oriented bias and fragmented cross-scale integration, with international studies demonstrating earlier theoretical maturity and multi-scalar analytical models, while Chinese research advances in streetscape image analysis, VR simulations, and perception-based designs. Despite their differing trajectories, both studies converge on the shared goal of enhancing walkability, health, and urban livability. This review highlights key research gaps—particularly intergenerational assessment frameworks, explainable analytics, and policy translation—and proposes pathways toward integrating design, planning, and governance to promote all-age-friendly streets worldwide.

BuildingsVol. 15(23)
North China University of Technology (CN), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

All-Age-Friendly Streets in Chinese and International Research: A Bibliometric and Comparative Review (1994–2024) — Marcus White, Xiaoran Huang, et al. · Buildings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS