Structural Response of a Two-Side-Supported Square Slab Under Varying Blast Positions from Center to Free Edge and Beyond in a Touch-Off Explosion Scenario

A touch-off explosion on concrete slabs is considered one of the simplest yet most destructive forms of adversarial loading on building elements. It causes far greater damage than explosions occurring at a distance. The impact is usually concentrated in a small area, leading to surface cratering, scabbing of concrete, and even tearing or rupture of the reinforcement. Studies available on the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) slabs under touch-off (contact) and standoff explosions commonly indicate that the maximum damage occurs when the blast is applied to the center of the slab. This observation raises an important question about how the position of an explosive charge, especially relative to the free edge of the slab, affects the overall damage pattern in slabs supported on only two sides with clamped supports. This study uses a modeling strategy combining Eulerian and Lagrangian domains using the finite element tools of Abaqus Explicit v2020 to examine the behavior of a square slab supported on two sides with clamped ends subjected to blast loads at different positions, ranging from the center to the free edge and beyond, under touch-off explosion conditions. The behavior of concrete was captured using the Concrete Damage Plasticity model, while the reinforcement was represented with the Johnson–Cook model. Effects of strain rate were included by applying calibrated dynamic increase factors. The developed numerical model is validated first with experimental data available in the published literature for the case where the explosive charge is positioned at the slab’s center, showing a very close agreement with the reported results. Along with the central blast position, five additional cases were considered for further investigation as they have not been investigated in the existing literature and were found to be worthy of study. The selected locations of the explosive charge included an intermediate zone (between the slab center and free edge), an in-slab region (partly embedded at the free edge), a partial edge (partially outside the slab), an external edge (fully outside the free edge), and an offset position (250 mm beyond the free edge along the central axis). Results indicated a noticeable transition in damage patterns as the detonation point shifted from the slab’s center toward and beyond the free edge. The failure mode changed from a balanced perforation under confined conditions to an asymmetric response near the free edge, dominated by weaker surface coupling but more pronounced tensile cracking and bottom-face perforation. The reinforcement experienced significantly varying tensile and compressive stresses depending on blast position, with the highest tensile demand occurring near free-edge detonations due to intensified local bending and uneven shock reflection.