Meta-analysis in public administration research: An interdisciplinary perspective review in the age of open science

This study combines content analysis and systematic literature review to examine the landscape of meta-analyses in public administration. Content analysis of 107 articles shows that research spans both micro- and macro-level topics, with particular emphasis on public policy, governance, and service delivery. We propose a structured framework for conducting meta-analyses and critically review 34 studies from five leading journals published over the past decade (2015–2024). Building on these findings, we offer four interdisciplinary recommendations to enhance methodological rigor, strengthen theoretical integration, and foster cumulative knowledge development in the era of open science. By highlighting the potential of meta-analysis to reconcile divergent findings, improve cross-national comparability, and inform evidence-based policy, this study consolidates its role as a foundational tool in public administration scholarship. Points for practitioners Meta-analysis equips public administrators and policymakers with a rigorous tool to synthesize empirical findings, reconcile inconsistent results, and compare policy effects across diverse institutional and national contexts. Meta-analyses in public administration address both macro-level issues (e.g. public policy, service delivery, climate governance) and micro-level concerns (e.g. trust, citizen satisfaction, employee motivation), highlighting their relevance for evidence-informed decision making. Researchers should follow established protocols while embracing open science practices—transparency, reproducibility, and contextual sensitivity—to enhance the credibility, comparability, and practical relevance of meta-analytic findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Administrative Sciences
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523251398486
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta-analysis in public administration research: An interdisciplinary perspective review in the age of open science

Kexin Wang, Yangyang Fan, Emily C. Blalock, Ran Zhang
International Review of Administrative Sciences
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Meta-analysis in public administration research: An interdisciplinary perspective review in the age of open science

Kexin Wang, Yangyang Fan, Emily C. Blalock, Ran Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study combines content analysis and systematic literature review to examine the landscape of meta-analyses in public administration. Content analysis of 107 articles shows that research spans both micro- and macro-level topics, with particular emphasis on public policy, governance, and service delivery. We propose a structured framework for conducting meta-analyses and critically review 34 studies from five leading journals published over the past decade (2015–2024). Building on these findings, we offer four interdisciplinary recommendations to enhance methodological rigor, strengthen theoretical integration, and foster cumulative knowledge development in the era of open science. By highlighting the potential of meta-analysis to reconcile divergent findings, improve cross-national comparability, and inform evidence-based policy, this study consolidates its role as a foundational tool in public administration scholarship. Points for practitioners Meta-analysis equips public administrators and policymakers with a rigorous tool to synthesize empirical findings, reconcile inconsistent results, and compare policy effects across diverse institutional and national contexts. Meta-analyses in public administration address both macro-level issues (e.g. public policy, service delivery, climate governance) and micro-level concerns (e.g. trust, citizen satisfaction, employee motivation), highlighting their relevance for evidence-informed decision making. Researchers should follow established protocols while embracing open science practices—transparency, reproducibility, and contextual sensitivity—to enhance the credibility, comparability, and practical relevance of meta-analytic findings.

International Review of Administrative SciencesVol. 92(1)
East China Normal University (CN), Belhaven University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.