Aesthetic Machines and the Production of Subjectivity: A postanthropocentric sociology of the aesthetic

This paper examines the entanglement of aesthetic and economic factors in contemporary capitalism. Sociological engagement with this problem has focused on commodifying processes, within a framework that is poorly suited to the deterritorialized character of capitalism. What we need to understand today is the aesthetic character of the production of subjectivity; for this, a differential and postanthropocentric ontology is needed. I argue that economic production is preceded by the creation and realization of the sensible. Here, aesthetic machines have an expressive function, involving the creation of possible worlds and the subjects they include. Building on the work of Lazzarato and Guattari, I suggest that humanizing processes are only one of the aesthetic apparatuses at play in the subjective economy. An attention to dehumanizing and desubjectivating processes is also necessary if we are to adequately understand the alignment of subjective forces with the momentum of capitalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Theory
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310251401531
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aesthetic Machines and the Production of Subjectivity: A postanthropocentric sociology of the aesthetic

Maria Hynes
European Journal of Social Theory
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Aesthetic Machines and the Production of Subjectivity: A postanthropocentric sociology of the aesthetic

Maria Hynes
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the entanglement of aesthetic and economic factors in contemporary capitalism. Sociological engagement with this problem has focused on commodifying processes, within a framework that is poorly suited to the deterritorialized character of capitalism. What we need to understand today is the aesthetic character of the production of subjectivity; for this, a differential and postanthropocentric ontology is needed. I argue that economic production is preceded by the creation and realization of the sensible. Here, aesthetic machines have an expressive function, involving the creation of possible worlds and the subjects they include. Building on the work of Lazzarato and Guattari, I suggest that humanizing processes are only one of the aesthetic apparatuses at play in the subjective economy. An attention to dehumanizing and desubjectivating processes is also necessary if we are to adequately understand the alignment of subjective forces with the momentum of capitalism.

European Journal of Social Theory
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.