Evaluation Techniques in Telemedicine: A Narrative Review of Models, Frameworks, and Assessment Tools

Telemedicine has rapidly expanded as a key component of modern healthcare, offering new opportunities for remote diagnosis, monitoring, consultation, and patient support. As its applications grow, the need for robust, standardized, and multidimensional evaluation methods becomes increasingly critical. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the techniques, tools, and frameworks used to evaluate telemedicine across diverse clinical and organizational settings. Literature was identified through targeted searches in PubMed and Scopus, supplemented by manual review of related sources. The analysis revealed substantial variability in evaluation approaches, with many studies focusing on isolated dimensions such as satisfaction, usability, or clinical outcomes. Although patient satisfaction with telemedicine remains consistently high, fewer studies rigorously assess system readiness, organizational integration, economic impact, or long-term clinical effectiveness. To address these gaps, this review organizes evaluation approaches into six domains: patient-centered factors, clinical effectiveness, technological performance, organizational readiness, economic considerations, and ethical and equity-related concerns. Based on these domains, an Integrated Telemedicine Evaluation Framework (ITEF) is proposed to support comprehensive assessment and guide researchers, clinicians, and policymakers in designing structured evaluation strategies. The review highlights the importance of combining validated measurement instruments with broader conceptual models to achieve reliable and comparable findings. Future research should prioritize standardization, development of validated tools, and longitudinal evaluations to capture telemedicine’s evolving impact over time. This work contributes to a more unified understanding of tel-emedicine evaluation and supports continued progress toward safe, effective, and equitable digital health services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
InfoScience Trends
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61882/ist.202502.10.02
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Techniques in Telemedicine: A Narrative Review of Models, Frameworks, and Assessment Tools

Mohamad Jebraeily, Hero Khezri
1 citations
InfoScience Trends
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
1.88
article

Evaluation Techniques in Telemedicine: A Narrative Review of Models, Frameworks, and Assessment Tools

Mohamad Jebraeily, Hero Khezri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Telemedicine has rapidly expanded as a key component of modern healthcare, offering new opportunities for remote diagnosis, monitoring, consultation, and patient support. As its applications grow, the need for robust, standardized, and multidimensional evaluation methods becomes increasingly critical. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the techniques, tools, and frameworks used to evaluate telemedicine across diverse clinical and organizational settings. Literature was identified through targeted searches in PubMed and Scopus, supplemented by manual review of related sources. The analysis revealed substantial variability in evaluation approaches, with many studies focusing on isolated dimensions such as satisfaction, usability, or clinical outcomes. Although patient satisfaction with telemedicine remains consistently high, fewer studies rigorously assess system readiness, organizational integration, economic impact, or long-term clinical effectiveness. To address these gaps, this review organizes evaluation approaches into six domains: patient-centered factors, clinical effectiveness, technological performance, organizational readiness, economic considerations, and ethical and equity-related concerns. Based on these domains, an Integrated Telemedicine Evaluation Framework (ITEF) is proposed to support comprehensive assessment and guide researchers, clinicians, and policymakers in designing structured evaluation strategies. The review highlights the importance of combining validated measurement instruments with broader conceptual models to achieve reliable and comparable findings. Future research should prioritize standardization, development of validated tools, and longitudinal evaluations to capture telemedicine’s evolving impact over time. This work contributes to a more unified understanding of tel-emedicine evaluation and supports continued progress toward safe, effective, and equitable digital health services.

InfoScience TrendsVol. 2(10)
Urmia University (IR), Urmia University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.