Population Size Differences Can Lead to Biases in Phylogenetic Inference and Introgression Detection in the Presence of Purifying Selection

Assumptions about the probability distribution of gene tree topologies provides a basis for phylogenetic reconstruction and introgression detection. Initial evidence has suggested that in the presence of purifying selection, population size differences can affect the probability distribution of gene tree topologies. Nevertheless, the impact of this phenomenon on phylogenetic reconstruction and introgression detection remains to be explored. Additionally, a theoretical understanding of this phenomenon remains absent. Here, using the population genetic simulation software SLiM, we provide evidence that in the presence of purifying selection, population size differences can cause biases in phylogenetic inference. We also provide evidence that in the presence of purifying selection, population size differences can cause statistics used for introgression detection to exhibit patterns resembling those caused by introgression. Additionally, we present a theoretical analysis showing that using a random gene tree labeling process to model the gene tree formation process in the occurrence of deep coalescence lacks a biological basis under purifying selection, and gene tree distributions under purifying selection are expected to exhibit population size dependence. This work underscores the importance of considering the potential confounding impact of purifying selection on phylogenetic inference and introgression detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic Biology
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf085
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Population Size Differences Can Lead to Biases in Phylogenetic Inference and Introgression Detection in the Presence of Purifying Selection

Meng‐Yun Chen, Hao Zhu, Chong He
Systematic Biology
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

Population Size Differences Can Lead to Biases in Phylogenetic Inference and Introgression Detection in the Presence of Purifying Selection

Meng‐Yun Chen, Hao Zhu, Chong He
article en

Abstract

Assumptions about the probability distribution of gene tree topologies provides a basis for phylogenetic reconstruction and introgression detection. Initial evidence has suggested that in the presence of purifying selection, population size differences can affect the probability distribution of gene tree topologies. Nevertheless, the impact of this phenomenon on phylogenetic reconstruction and introgression detection remains to be explored. Additionally, a theoretical understanding of this phenomenon remains absent. Here, using the population genetic simulation software SLiM, we provide evidence that in the presence of purifying selection, population size differences can cause biases in phylogenetic inference. We also provide evidence that in the presence of purifying selection, population size differences can cause statistics used for introgression detection to exhibit patterns resembling those caused by introgression. Additionally, we present a theoretical analysis showing that using a random gene tree labeling process to model the gene tree formation process in the occurrence of deep coalescence lacks a biological basis under purifying selection, and gene tree distributions under purifying selection are expected to exhibit population size dependence. This work underscores the importance of considering the potential confounding impact of purifying selection on phylogenetic inference and introgression detection.

Systematic Biology
South China Normal University (CN), Shanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology (CN), Southern Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.