A Critical Review of the Literature on Privately Owned Public Spaces: From Intrinsic Critiques to Systematic Assessment
Since the 1960s, Privately Owned Public Space (POPS) has been studied as a significant development in urban space provision. Through a review of key studies (1980–2023), this paper traces how POPS scholarship has changed from fundamental critiques of privatization to evidence-based assessment of spatial practices. The analysis reveals three phases in the literature's development, demonstrating a shift from early concerns about intrinsic problems of private control to accepting POPS as a distinct type of public space requiring its systematic evaluation. The geographical expansion of research has explored how different cultural, institutional, and urban contexts shape the implementation of POPS and scholarly approaches to studying them.
Authors
- Quentin Stevens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0912-0426)
- Mohammad Mohammadi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-3113)
Institutions
- MIT University (MK)
- RMIT University (AU)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Planning Literature
- Published
- 2025-12-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122251400201
- Primary Topic
- Urban Planning and Governance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00