Postpartum healthcare utilization and morbidity among diabetic versus nondiabetic individuals in remote hypertension program

Abstract Introduction Individuals with diabetes (gestational or pregestational) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, particularly in the setting of hypertension (HTN) in pregnancy. Though remote self‐measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring programs may reduce rates of HTN‐related hospital readmission, emergency department (ED) presentations, or severe maternal morbidity (SMM), it is unclear whether the extent of this reduction differs between those with and without diabetes. We aimed to compare outcomes between postpartum patients in our remote SMBP program with versus without diabetes. Methods Since November 2022, postpartum patients with HTN at our tertiary care hospital have been offered enrollment in our remote SMBP program, which involves a nurse practitioner remotely managing blood pressure for 6 weeks postpartum. For this analysis, participants were stratified by the presence of pregestational or gestational diabetes. Participants with unknown diabetes status were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of postpartum readmission or ED presentation for HTN within 30 days of delivery hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included HTN‐related SMM and remote medication initiation. A generalized linear model was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) after adjustment for differences in demographic, obstetric, and medical conditions. Results Among the first 2000 participants in the SMBP program, 17% had diabetes. Compared to those without diabetes, those with diabetes were older, less likely to identify as White, or have gestational hypertension. They were more likely to have chronic hypertension, be delivered via cesarean, and have a lower median gestational age at delivery. After adjusting for these factors, there was no difference in the risk of the composite outcome of HTN‐related postpartum readmission or ED presentation between those with and without diabetes (15.92% vs. 16.56%; adjusted RR, 0.92 [0.70, 1.21]). Similarly, there were no differences in secondary outcomes. Conclusion In our remote SMBP program for postpartum patients with HTN, unplanned HTN‐related healthcare utilization or SMM was similar between those with and without diabetes. While this study may have been underpowered to detect small differences, these findings suggest that at a minimum, the current monitoring strategy meets the standard of care for patients with HTN and diabetes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70183
Primary Topic
Maternal and fetal healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postpartum healthcare utilization and morbidity among diabetic versus nondiabetic individuals in remote hypertension program

William D. Hunt, Marco Castillo, Anna Palatnik, Tracy L. Jackson et al.
Pregnancy
Maternal and fetal healthcare
article

Postpartum healthcare utilization and morbidity among diabetic versus nondiabetic individuals in remote hypertension program

William D. Hunt, Marco Castillo, Anna Palatnik, Tracy L. Jackson, Erica Hardy, Danielle Simmons, Adam Korrick Lewkowitz, Alisse Hauspurg, Jessica Chen, Methodius Gamuo Tuuli, Silmara Rodrigues Machado, Rodolfo Fernandez‐Criado, Nicole Konecke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Individuals with diabetes (gestational or pregestational) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, particularly in the setting of hypertension (HTN) in pregnancy. Though remote self‐measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring programs may reduce rates of HTN‐related hospital readmission, emergency department (ED) presentations, or severe maternal morbidity (SMM), it is unclear whether the extent of this reduction differs between those with and without diabetes. We aimed to compare outcomes between postpartum patients in our remote SMBP program with versus without diabetes. Methods Since November 2022, postpartum patients with HTN at our tertiary care hospital have been offered enrollment in our remote SMBP program, which involves a nurse practitioner remotely managing blood pressure for 6 weeks postpartum. For this analysis, participants were stratified by the presence of pregestational or gestational diabetes. Participants with unknown diabetes status were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of postpartum readmission or ED presentation for HTN within 30 days of delivery hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included HTN‐related SMM and remote medication initiation. A generalized linear model was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) after adjustment for differences in demographic, obstetric, and medical conditions. Results Among the first 2000 participants in the SMBP program, 17% had diabetes. Compared to those without diabetes, those with diabetes were older, less likely to identify as White, or have gestational hypertension. They were more likely to have chronic hypertension, be delivered via cesarean, and have a lower median gestational age at delivery. After adjusting for these factors, there was no difference in the risk of the composite outcome of HTN‐related postpartum readmission or ED presentation between those with and without diabetes (15.92% vs. 16.56%; adjusted RR, 0.92 [0.70, 1.21]). Similarly, there were no differences in secondary outcomes. Conclusion In our remote SMBP program for postpartum patients with HTN, unplanned HTN‐related healthcare utilization or SMM was similar between those with and without diabetes. While this study may have been underpowered to detect small differences, these findings suggest that at a minimum, the current monitoring strategy meets the standard of care for patients with HTN and diabetes.

PregnancyVol. 2(1)
Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Maternal and fetal healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.