Examining and Evaluating Team Science Competencies Through Sensemaking

Over the past 25 years, teams have become the standard for scientific endeavors. Team science is a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach to research that brings together diverse experts to solve problems that cannot be addressed by a single discipline. While disciplinary expertise is crucial, successful innovation in team science also depends on core competencies beyond individual skills. Competencies such as facilitating affect, team communication, managing research, collaborative problem-solving, and team leadership are vital for assessing both team readiness and ongoing competency development. However, evaluating these complex competencies remains a significant challenge for team leaders, members, and evaluators alike. Drawing on sensemaking as a theoretical grounding—emphasizing the adaptive use of experience in new environments—this article proposes a novel, multimodal conceptual model for evaluating team science effectiveness. The model presented offers an alternative approach to assessing these competencies by leveraging diverse observational lenses from the social sciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Evaluation
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140251383896
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining and Evaluating Team Science Competencies Through Sensemaking

Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Alfred Vitale, Deborah DiazGranados
1 citations
American Journal of Evaluation
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
4.17
article

Examining and Evaluating Team Science Competencies Through Sensemaking

Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Alfred Vitale, Deborah DiazGranados
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Over the past 25 years, teams have become the standard for scientific endeavors. Team science is a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach to research that brings together diverse experts to solve problems that cannot be addressed by a single discipline. While disciplinary expertise is crucial, successful innovation in team science also depends on core competencies beyond individual skills. Competencies such as facilitating affect, team communication, managing research, collaborative problem-solving, and team leadership are vital for assessing both team readiness and ongoing competency development. However, evaluating these complex competencies remains a significant challenge for team leaders, members, and evaluators alike. Drawing on sensemaking as a theoretical grounding—emphasizing the adaptive use of experience in new environments—this article proposes a novel, multimodal conceptual model for evaluating team science effectiveness. The model presented offers an alternative approach to assessing these competencies by leveraging diverse observational lenses from the social sciences.

American Journal of EvaluationVol. 47(1)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), George Washington University (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.