Understanding medical information and emotional support needs in mental health questions with large language models

Purpose This study seeks to bridge the gap between users’ multidimensional needs and the single-task capabilities of existing Mental Health Question Answering (MHQA) systems by tackling the underexplored challenge of jointly understanding medical informational needs and emotional support needs within complex consumer mental health inquiries. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST), the proposed Multi-Needs and Context Recognition (MNCR) framework decomposes mental health question understanding task into four interrelated subtasks: Medical Needs Recognition (MNR), Medical Needs-related Context Extraction (MNCE), Emotional Needs Recognition (ENR) and Emotional Needs-related Context Extraction (ENCE). A new benchmark dataset, MHQ-MedEmo, was constructed through multi-layered semantic annotation of 703 clinical queries sourced from real-world online health consultation platforms. The performances of six base LLMs and two fine-tuned LLMs were evaluated across precision, recall, F1 score and latency metrics. Findings Dense, fine-tuned models strike the optimal balance between accuracy and latency for end-to-end MNCR tasks; subtask sensitivity varies markedly across different model architectures; fine-tuning consistently enhances overall performance; the joint-prompt strategy consistently improves both effectiveness and efficiency over the separate-prompt strategy and model architecture and scale significantly influence performance on MNCR subtasks. Originality/value This study introduces MNCR and MHQ-MedEmo, the first framework and benchmark for simultaneously understanding medical informational needs and emotional support needs in mental health questions. Comparative evaluation of eight LLMs reveals distinct model-specific strengths, guiding future architectures that balance accuracy and latency and offering concrete guidance for healthcare organizations seeking to deploy LLM-based MHQA solutions in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Management & Data Systems
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-05-2025-0609
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding medical information and emotional support needs in mental health questions with large language models

C. Liu, Gohar F. Khan, William Yu Chung Wang
Industrial Management & Data Systems
Mental Health via Writing
article

Understanding medical information and emotional support needs in mental health questions with large language models

C. Liu, Gohar F. Khan, William Yu Chung Wang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study seeks to bridge the gap between users’ multidimensional needs and the single-task capabilities of existing Mental Health Question Answering (MHQA) systems by tackling the underexplored challenge of jointly understanding medical informational needs and emotional support needs within complex consumer mental health inquiries. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST), the proposed Multi-Needs and Context Recognition (MNCR) framework decomposes mental health question understanding task into four interrelated subtasks: Medical Needs Recognition (MNR), Medical Needs-related Context Extraction (MNCE), Emotional Needs Recognition (ENR) and Emotional Needs-related Context Extraction (ENCE). A new benchmark dataset, MHQ-MedEmo, was constructed through multi-layered semantic annotation of 703 clinical queries sourced from real-world online health consultation platforms. The performances of six base LLMs and two fine-tuned LLMs were evaluated across precision, recall, F1 score and latency metrics. Findings Dense, fine-tuned models strike the optimal balance between accuracy and latency for end-to-end MNCR tasks; subtask sensitivity varies markedly across different model architectures; fine-tuning consistently enhances overall performance; the joint-prompt strategy consistently improves both effectiveness and efficiency over the separate-prompt strategy and model architecture and scale significantly influence performance on MNCR subtasks. Originality/value This study introduces MNCR and MHQ-MedEmo, the first framework and benchmark for simultaneously understanding medical informational needs and emotional support needs in mental health questions. Comparative evaluation of eight LLMs reveals distinct model-specific strengths, guiding future architectures that balance accuracy and latency and offering concrete guidance for healthcare organizations seeking to deploy LLM-based MHQA solutions in practice.

Industrial Management & Data Systems
University of Waikato (NZ), Zayed University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.