Integrating Ensemble NSGA‐II for Multi‐Objective Process Optimization: Refolding of Proinsulin as a Case Study

In-vitro refolding of biotherapeutic inclusion bodies has long been recognized as a bottleneck in protein production in host systems such as Escherichia coli. Low throughput, costly reagents, and offline analysis often plague refolding development efforts. Refolding optimization typically employs statistical approaches such as Design of Experiments (DoE). While DOE offers advantage over univariate one-factor-at-a-time analysis, but it requires large subset sampling, which is cost-inefficient and labour-intensive. This paper demonstrates a knowledge-based refolding optimization, contrasted to the typical DoE-based protocol for proinsulin. The reaction is monitored and segmented into two parts (segment 1: 0-2 h and segment 2:2-6 h) based on the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) and Reverse Phase- High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) analysis. The data is fed to a multi-objective optimization (MOO) method that utilize XGBoost, coupled with an NSGA-II optimizer. Based on the Pareto front, a linear correlation between parameters was observed in segments 1 and 2. An ensemble coupled non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) was developed to optimize the reaction conditions beforehand. The proposed optimizer was then compared with the traditional DoE-based optimization. The developed optimization framework increased the yield to 65% ± 1.78% compared to 54% ± 2.62% in the traditional DoE-based approach (relatively 20% higher). The approach could combine screening and optimization analysis in a single step, dramatically reducing the overall experimental efforts by ∼50%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.70119
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Protein purification and stability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Ensemble NSGA‐II for Multi‐Objective Process Optimization: Refolding of Proinsulin as a Case Study

Anurag Singh Rathore, Rashmi Sharma, Naveen G. Jesubalan
1 citations
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Protein purification and stability
0.81
article

Integrating Ensemble NSGA‐II for Multi‐Objective Process Optimization: Refolding of Proinsulin as a Case Study

Anurag Singh Rathore, Rashmi Sharma, Naveen G. Jesubalan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In-vitro refolding of biotherapeutic inclusion bodies has long been recognized as a bottleneck in protein production in host systems such as Escherichia coli. Low throughput, costly reagents, and offline analysis often plague refolding development efforts. Refolding optimization typically employs statistical approaches such as Design of Experiments (DoE). While DOE offers advantage over univariate one-factor-at-a-time analysis, but it requires large subset sampling, which is cost-inefficient and labour-intensive. This paper demonstrates a knowledge-based refolding optimization, contrasted to the typical DoE-based protocol for proinsulin. The reaction is monitored and segmented into two parts (segment 1: 0-2 h and segment 2:2-6 h) based on the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) and Reverse Phase- High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) analysis. The data is fed to a multi-objective optimization (MOO) method that utilize XGBoost, coupled with an NSGA-II optimizer. Based on the Pareto front, a linear correlation between parameters was observed in segments 1 and 2. An ensemble coupled non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) was developed to optimize the reaction conditions beforehand. The proposed optimizer was then compared with the traditional DoE-based optimization. The developed optimization framework increased the yield to 65% ± 1.78% compared to 54% ± 2.62% in the traditional DoE-based approach (relatively 20% higher). The approach could combine screening and optimization analysis in a single step, dramatically reducing the overall experimental efforts by ∼50%.

Biotechnology and BioengineeringVol. 123(3)
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Tata Consultancy Services, Tata Sons
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Protein purification and stability
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.