Mendelian Randomization in Eye Research: Powerful, but Prone to Misuse

Mendelian Randomization in Eye Research: Powerful, but Prone to MisuseMendelian randomization (MR) was first introduced in 2003 as a natural experiment to help make causal inference in observational studies. 1 It has become a widely used method to reduce confounding in epidemiological studies. [2][3]3][4] In recent years, the number of MR studies increases exponentially, driven largely by the growing availability of large-scale genetic data.The number of PubMed-indexed MR publications across medicine has risen from 899 in 2020 to more than 6000 annually in 2024 to 2025.Ophthalmology and vision science reflect a similar trend: MR publications increased from only 17 in 2020 to over 220 in 2025, with a parallel surge in submissions to Translational Vision Science & Technology (TVST).Specifically, MR submission to TVST increased from 7 (0.8%) in 2023 to 44 (4.3%) in 2024.Whereas this growth demonstrates the community's enthusiasm for MR analysis, it also raises concerns about its appropriate use, as evidenced in several recent journal editorials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.14.12.5
Primary Topic
Retinal Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mendelian Randomization in Eye Research: Powerful, but Prone to Misuse

Gui‐Shuang Ying, Roy S. Chuck
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Retinal Development and Disorders
article

Mendelian Randomization in Eye Research: Powerful, but Prone to Misuse

Gui‐Shuang Ying, Roy S. Chuck
article en

Abstract

Mendelian Randomization in Eye Research: Powerful, but Prone to MisuseMendelian randomization (MR) was first introduced in 2003 as a natural experiment to help make causal inference in observational studies. 1 It has become a widely used method to reduce confounding in epidemiological studies. [2][3]3][4] In recent years, the number of MR studies increases exponentially, driven largely by the growing availability of large-scale genetic data.The number of PubMed-indexed MR publications across medicine has risen from 899 in 2020 to more than 6000 annually in 2024 to 2025.Ophthalmology and vision science reflect a similar trend: MR publications increased from only 17 in 2020 to over 220 in 2025, with a parallel surge in submissions to Translational Vision Science & Technology (TVST).Specifically, MR submission to TVST increased from 7 (0.8%) in 2023 to 44 (4.3%) in 2024.Whereas this growth demonstrates the community's enthusiasm for MR analysis, it also raises concerns about its appropriate use, as evidenced in several recent journal editorials.

Translational Vision Science & TechnologyVol. 14(12)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (US), National University of Singapore (SG), Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Research to Prevent Blindness
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Retinal Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mendelian Randomization in Eye Research: Powerful, but Prone to Misuse — Gui‐Shuang Ying, Roy S. Chuck · Translational Vision Science & Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS