Italian validation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP): A multicenter cross-sectional study

BackgroundMoral distress occurs when ethically appropriate actions cannot be implemented, resulting in cognitive and emotional strain linked to outcomes like burnout and staff turnover. Despite extensive cross-cultural validation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP), no Italian adaptation currently exists, limiting research in Italian contexts.AimTo culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP-ITA) within two major Italian healthcare settings.MethodsAn observational multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to September 2023. The original questionnaire underwent forward-backward translation. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses evaluated structural validity, and Cronbach's alpha assessed internal consistency. Construct validity was tested by correlating scores with the Ethical Leadership Scale.ParticipantsA sample of 567 healthcare professionals (median age 43 years; 74% female; 74% nurses) was recruited and completed the Italian version of the questionnaire online.Ethical considerationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the two healthcare institutions involved. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.ResultsThe Italian version demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96). Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor model explaining 58.6% of the variance, with dimensions reflecting: (1) System-level constraints, (2) Team-level dynamics, and (3) Patient/family-level conflicts. Convergent validity was confirmed via significant associations with related constructs: moral distress scores were higher among nurses, younger professionals, and those considering job departure, and negatively correlated with ethical leadership ratings (r = -0.375, <i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThe Italian version of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing moral distress among Italian healthcare professionals, effectively capturing the multidimensionality of the construct in a culturally relevant way.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251403135
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Italian validation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP): A multicenter cross-sectional study

Federico Marchetti, Monica Parati, Giacomo Gualtieri, Giulia Viganó et al.
Nursing Ethics
Ethics in medical practice
article

Italian validation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP): A multicenter cross-sectional study

Federico Marchetti, Monica Parati, Giacomo Gualtieri, Giulia Viganó, Linda Fiaschi, Andrea Pozza, Lavinia Fiorentino, Alessandra Gorini, Monica Casati, Simonetta Cesa, Daniele Marchetti
article en

Abstract

BackgroundMoral distress occurs when ethically appropriate actions cannot be implemented, resulting in cognitive and emotional strain linked to outcomes like burnout and staff turnover. Despite extensive cross-cultural validation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP), no Italian adaptation currently exists, limiting research in Italian contexts.AimTo culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP-ITA) within two major Italian healthcare settings.MethodsAn observational multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to September 2023. The original questionnaire underwent forward-backward translation. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses evaluated structural validity, and Cronbach's alpha assessed internal consistency. Construct validity was tested by correlating scores with the Ethical Leadership Scale.ParticipantsA sample of 567 healthcare professionals (median age 43 years; 74% female; 74% nurses) was recruited and completed the Italian version of the questionnaire online.Ethical considerationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the two healthcare institutions involved. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.ResultsThe Italian version demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96). Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor model explaining 58.6% of the variance, with dimensions reflecting: (1) System-level constraints, (2) Team-level dynamics, and (3) Patient/family-level conflicts. Convergent validity was confirmed via significant associations with related constructs: moral distress scores were higher among nurses, younger professionals, and those considering job departure, and negatively correlated with ethical leadership ratings (r = -0.375, <i>p</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThe Italian version of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing moral distress among Italian healthcare professionals, effectively capturing the multidimensionality of the construct in a culturally relevant way.

Nursing Ethics
University of Siena (IT), University of Milan (IT), Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria alle Scotte (IT), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT), MemorialCare Health System (US), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.