A Comparative Analysis of Low-Cost Devices for High-Precision Diameter at Breast Height Estimation

Forestry is essential for environmental sustainability, biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, and renewable resource management. Traditional methods for forest inventory, particularly the manual measurement of diameter at breast height (DBH), are labor-intensive and prone to error. Recent advancements in proximal sensing, including lidar and photogrammetry, have paved the way for more efficient approaches, yet high costs remain a barrier to widespread adoption. This study investigates the potential of close-range photogrammetry (CRP) using low-cost devices, such as smartphones, cameras, and specialized handheld laser scanners (Stonex and LIVOX prototype), to generate 3D point clouds for accurate DBH estimation. We compared these devices by assessing their agreement and efficiency when compared to conventional methods in diverse forest conditions across multiple tree species. Additionally, we analyze factors influencing measurement errors and propose a comprehensive decision-making framework to guide technology selection in forest inventory. The results show that the lowest-cost devices and photogrammetric methods achieved the highest agreement with the conventional (caliper-based) measurements, while mobile applications were the fastest and least expensive but also the least accurate. Photogrammetry provided the most accurate DBH estimates (error ≈ 0.7 cm) but required the highest effort; handheld laser scanners achieved an average accuracy of about 1.5 cm at substantially higher cost, while mobile applications were the fastest and least expensive but also the least accurate (3–3.5 cm error). The outcomes of this research aim to facilitate more accessible, reliable, and sustainable forest management practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233888
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Low-Cost Devices for High-Precision Diameter at Breast Height Estimation

Daniel Tomčík, Jozef Výbošťok, Juliána Chudá, Julián Tomaštík et al.
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

A Comparative Analysis of Low-Cost Devices for High-Precision Diameter at Breast Height Estimation

Daniel Tomčík, Jozef Výbošťok, Juliána Chudá, Julián Tomaštík, Martin Mokroš, Roman Kadlečík
article en

Abstract

Forestry is essential for environmental sustainability, biodiversity conservation, carbon sequestration, and renewable resource management. Traditional methods for forest inventory, particularly the manual measurement of diameter at breast height (DBH), are labor-intensive and prone to error. Recent advancements in proximal sensing, including lidar and photogrammetry, have paved the way for more efficient approaches, yet high costs remain a barrier to widespread adoption. This study investigates the potential of close-range photogrammetry (CRP) using low-cost devices, such as smartphones, cameras, and specialized handheld laser scanners (Stonex and LIVOX prototype), to generate 3D point clouds for accurate DBH estimation. We compared these devices by assessing their agreement and efficiency when compared to conventional methods in diverse forest conditions across multiple tree species. Additionally, we analyze factors influencing measurement errors and propose a comprehensive decision-making framework to guide technology selection in forest inventory. The results show that the lowest-cost devices and photogrammetric methods achieved the highest agreement with the conventional (caliper-based) measurements, while mobile applications were the fastest and least expensive but also the least accurate. Photogrammetry provided the most accurate DBH estimates (error ≈ 0.7 cm) but required the highest effort; handheld laser scanners achieved an average accuracy of about 1.5 cm at substantially higher cost, while mobile applications were the fastest and least expensive but also the least accurate (3–3.5 cm error). The outcomes of this research aim to facilitate more accessible, reliable, and sustainable forest management practices.

Remote SensingVol. 17(23)
Technická univerzita vo Zvolene (SK), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.