Waveform Analysis for Enhancing Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry in Turbid and Shallow Tidal Flats of the Korean West Coast

Tidal flats play a vital role in coastal ecosystems by supporting biodiversity, mitigating natural hazards, and functioning as blue carbon reservoirs. However, monitoring their geomorphological changes remains challenging due to high turbidity, shallow depths, and tidal variability. Conventional approaches—such as satellite remote sensing, acoustic sounding, and topographic LiDAR—face limitations in resolution, accessibility, or coverage of submerged areas. Airborne bathymetric LiDAR (ABL), which uses green laser pulses to detect reflections from both the water surface and seabed, has emerged as a promising alternative. Unlike traditional discrete-return data, full waveform analysis offers greater accuracy, resolution, and reliability, enabling more flexible point cloud generation and extraction of additional signal parameters. A critical step in ABL processing is waveform decomposition, which separates complex returns into individual components. Conventional methods typically assume fixed models with three returns (water surface, water column, bottom), which perform adequately in clear waters but deteriorate under shallow and turbid conditions. To address these limitations, we propose an adaptive progressive Gaussian decomposition (APGD) tailored to tidal flat environments. APGD introduces adaptive signal range selection and termination criteria to suppress noise, better accommodate asymmetric echoes, and incorporates a water-layer classification module. Validation with datasets from Korea’s west coast tidal flats acquired by the Seahawk ABL system demonstrates that APGD outperforms both the vendor software and the conventional PGD, yielding higher reliability in bottom detection and improved bathymetric completeness. At the two test sites with different turbidity conditions, APGD achieved seabed coverage ratios of 66.7–70.4% and bottom-classification accuracies of 97.3% and 96.7%. Depth accuracy assessments further confirmed that APGD reduced mean depth errors compared with PGD, effectively minimizing systematic bias in bathymetric estimation. These results demonstrate APGD as a practical and effective tool for enhancing tidal flat monitoring and management.