Bridging Uncertainty in SWMM Model Calibration: A Bayesian Analysis of Optimal Rainfall Selection

SWMM (Stormwater Management Model) is one of the most widely used computation tools in urban water resources management. Traditionally, the choice of rainfall data for calibrating the SWMM model has been arbitrary, lacking clarity on the most suitable rainfall types. In addition, the simplification in the SWMM hydrological module of the rainfall–runoff process, coupled with measurement errors, introduces a high level of uncertainty in the calibration. This study investigates the influences of rainfall types on the highly uncertain SWMM model calibration by implementing the Bayesian inference theory. A Bayesian SWMM calibration framework was established, in which an advanced DREAM(zs) (Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis, Version ZS) sampling method was used. The investigation focused on eight key hydrological parameters of SWMM. The impact of rainfall types was analyzed using nine rainfall intensities and three rainfall patterns. Results show that rainfall events equivalent to a one-year return period (R5, 42.70 mm total depth) or higher generally yield the most accurate parameters, with posterior distribution standard deviations reduced by 40–60% compared to low-intensity rainfalls. Notably, three parameters (impervious area percentage [Imperv], storage depth of impervious area [S-imperv], and Manning’s coefficient of impervious area [N-imperv]) demonstrated consistent accuracy irrespective of rainfall intensity, with a coefficient of variation below 0.05 for Imperv and S-imperv across all rainfall intensities. Furthermore, it was found that rainfall events with double peaks resulted in more satisfactory calibration compared to single or triple peaks, reducing the standard deviation of the Width parameter from 168.647 (single-peak) to 110.789 (double-peak). The findings from this study could offer valuable insights for selecting appropriate rainfall events before SWMM model calibration for more accurate predictions when it comes to urban non-point pollution control strategies and watershed management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17233435
Primary Topic
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging Uncertainty in SWMM Model Calibration: A Bayesian Analysis of Optimal Rainfall Selection

Zhiyu Shao, Scott A. Yost, Jiahui Du, Xiaoyuan Zhang et al.
Water
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
article

Bridging Uncertainty in SWMM Model Calibration: A Bayesian Analysis of Optimal Rainfall Selection

Zhiyu Shao, Scott A. Yost, Jiahui Du, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Jinsong Wang
article en

Abstract

SWMM (Stormwater Management Model) is one of the most widely used computation tools in urban water resources management. Traditionally, the choice of rainfall data for calibrating the SWMM model has been arbitrary, lacking clarity on the most suitable rainfall types. In addition, the simplification in the SWMM hydrological module of the rainfall–runoff process, coupled with measurement errors, introduces a high level of uncertainty in the calibration. This study investigates the influences of rainfall types on the highly uncertain SWMM model calibration by implementing the Bayesian inference theory. A Bayesian SWMM calibration framework was established, in which an advanced DREAM(zs) (Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis, Version ZS) sampling method was used. The investigation focused on eight key hydrological parameters of SWMM. The impact of rainfall types was analyzed using nine rainfall intensities and three rainfall patterns. Results show that rainfall events equivalent to a one-year return period (R5, 42.70 mm total depth) or higher generally yield the most accurate parameters, with posterior distribution standard deviations reduced by 40–60% compared to low-intensity rainfalls. Notably, three parameters (impervious area percentage [Imperv], storage depth of impervious area [S-imperv], and Manning’s coefficient of impervious area [N-imperv]) demonstrated consistent accuracy irrespective of rainfall intensity, with a coefficient of variation below 0.05 for Imperv and S-imperv across all rainfall intensities. Furthermore, it was found that rainfall events with double peaks resulted in more satisfactory calibration compared to single or triple peaks, reducing the standard deviation of the Width parameter from 168.647 (single-peak) to 110.789 (double-peak). The findings from this study could offer valuable insights for selecting appropriate rainfall events before SWMM model calibration for more accurate predictions when it comes to urban non-point pollution control strategies and watershed management.

WaterVol. 17(23)
University of Kentucky (US), Chongqing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.