The HIT-6 Questionnaire Corresponds to the PedMIDAS for Assessment of Pediatric Headaches

<b>Objective:</b> The aim of our study was to compare two questionnaires regarding their ability to globally assess the impact of headaches on daily functioning in children as a primary endpoint and, secondarily, to evaluate their correlation to frequency and headache strength. <b>Background:</b> Headache is a common complaint in children and adolescents, leading to functional impairment. The impact of primary headaches, such as migraine and tension-type headaches, varies according to pain severity and frequency. Although the PedMIDAS questionnaire is a validated tool for assessing headache-related impact in children, it can be difficult for children to complete. The HIT-6 questionnaire is user-friendly but has been validated exclusively for use in adults. <b>Methods:</b> Our method involved a prospective cohort study in children aged 6-18 years who visited the headache clinic at Bnai Zion Medical Center due to primary headaches. All children filled in both the PedMIDAS and HIT-6. Data on headache diagnosis, frequency and intensity along with demographic data were obtained. <b>Results:</b> Of the 100 children participating, 96 completed both questionnaires. The final sample was 66% (63) female, and the average age was 14 years (±3.3). Migraine was reported by 62% (60), followed by tension-type headaches (18%) and mixed headache (15%). A weak positive spearman correlation was observed between PedMIDAS and HIT-6 scores to age (respectively, ρ 0.3 with <i>p</i> value < 0.005, and ρ 0.2 with <i>p</i> value < 0.05), a weak positive spearman correlation as well between the HIT-6 score and both disease duration and headache intensity (respectively, ρ 0.221 with <i>p</i> value < 0.05 and ρ 0.250 with <i>p</i> value < 0.05). PedMIDAS score was weakly positively correlated to headache frequency (ρ 0.27 with <i>p</i> value < 0.05). A moderately positive spearman correlation was found between the PedMIDAS and HIT scores with ρ 0.6 and <i>p</i> value < 0.005. Linear regression analysis revealed a stronger correlation with headache frequency for the HIT-6 than for the PedMIDAS, when adjusted to gender and headache type. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HIT-6 questionnaire correlates with the PedMIDAS questionnaire and can serve as a good alternative for easily evaluating headache burden in children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13233158
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The HIT-6 Questionnaire Corresponds to the PedMIDAS for Assessment of Pediatric Headaches

Jacob Genizi, Richard Mansour, Liat Yaniv, Keren Nathan et al.
1 citations
Healthcare
Migraine and Headache Studies
1.47
article

The HIT-6 Questionnaire Corresponds to the PedMIDAS for Assessment of Pediatric Headaches

Jacob Genizi, Richard Mansour, Liat Yaniv, Keren Nathan, Lisa Kaly, Shoshana Gal, Malak Burbara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> The aim of our study was to compare two questionnaires regarding their ability to globally assess the impact of headaches on daily functioning in children as a primary endpoint and, secondarily, to evaluate their correlation to frequency and headache strength. <b>Background:</b> Headache is a common complaint in children and adolescents, leading to functional impairment. The impact of primary headaches, such as migraine and tension-type headaches, varies according to pain severity and frequency. Although the PedMIDAS questionnaire is a validated tool for assessing headache-related impact in children, it can be difficult for children to complete. The HIT-6 questionnaire is user-friendly but has been validated exclusively for use in adults. <b>Methods:</b> Our method involved a prospective cohort study in children aged 6-18 years who visited the headache clinic at Bnai Zion Medical Center due to primary headaches. All children filled in both the PedMIDAS and HIT-6. Data on headache diagnosis, frequency and intensity along with demographic data were obtained. <b>Results:</b> Of the 100 children participating, 96 completed both questionnaires. The final sample was 66% (63) female, and the average age was 14 years (±3.3). Migraine was reported by 62% (60), followed by tension-type headaches (18%) and mixed headache (15%). A weak positive spearman correlation was observed between PedMIDAS and HIT-6 scores to age (respectively, ρ 0.3 with <i>p</i> value < 0.005, and ρ 0.2 with <i>p</i> value < 0.05), a weak positive spearman correlation as well between the HIT-6 score and both disease duration and headache intensity (respectively, ρ 0.221 with <i>p</i> value < 0.05 and ρ 0.250 with <i>p</i> value < 0.05). PedMIDAS score was weakly positively correlated to headache frequency (ρ 0.27 with <i>p</i> value < 0.05). A moderately positive spearman correlation was found between the PedMIDAS and HIT scores with ρ 0.6 and <i>p</i> value < 0.005. Linear regression analysis revealed a stronger correlation with headache frequency for the HIT-6 than for the PedMIDAS, when adjusted to gender and headache type. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HIT-6 questionnaire correlates with the PedMIDAS questionnaire and can serve as a good alternative for easily evaluating headache burden in children.

HealthcareVol. 13(23)
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Bnai Zion Medical Center (IL), Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Migraine and Headache Studies
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.