Integrating evidence synthesis into doctoral research: A guide for family medicine and primary care

Given the increased complexity of healthcare needs, evidence-informed practices are needed, now more than ever. Combining the best available research evidence, the perspectives of patients and communities, and the voices of healthcare workers in guiding policy and practice is essential. All of us involved in providing and strengthening family medicine and primary care need to be good consumers (users) of research, and some will be good producers (doers) of research. In both using and doing research, a helpful starting point is evidence synthesis - a form of secondary research that collates primary research on the same research question. This short report outlines when and how to incorporate evidence synthesis into doctoral work, highlighting methodological considerations, ethical principles and reporting standards. Practical tips and decision points are provided to support relevance, rigour and impact. Thoughtful integration of evidence synthesis - whether by using existing reviews or conducting new ones - enables doctoral researchers to contribute meaningfully to evidence-informed primary care practice and policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i2.5198
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating evidence synthesis into doctoral research: A guide for family medicine and primary care

Klaus B. Von Pressentin, Taryn Young, Jacob Shabani
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Integrating evidence synthesis into doctoral research: A guide for family medicine and primary care

Klaus B. Von Pressentin, Taryn Young, Jacob Shabani
article en

Abstract

Given the increased complexity of healthcare needs, evidence-informed practices are needed, now more than ever. Combining the best available research evidence, the perspectives of patients and communities, and the voices of healthcare workers in guiding policy and practice is essential. All of us involved in providing and strengthening family medicine and primary care need to be good consumers (users) of research, and some will be good producers (doers) of research. In both using and doing research, a helpful starting point is evidence synthesis - a form of secondary research that collates primary research on the same research question. This short report outlines when and how to incorporate evidence synthesis into doctoral work, highlighting methodological considerations, ethical principles and reporting standards. Practical tips and decision points are provided to support relevance, rigour and impact. Thoughtful integration of evidence synthesis - whether by using existing reviews or conducting new ones - enables doctoral researchers to contribute meaningfully to evidence-informed primary care practice and policy.

African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family MedicineVol. 17(2)
University of Cape Town (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating evidence synthesis into doctoral research: A guide for family medicine and primary care — Klaus B. Von Pressentin, Taryn Young, et al. · African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS