Identification of ‘Geology–Engineering’ Sweet Spots in Shale Gas Reservoirs Based on the TBO-XGBoost-GAFM Model: A Case Study of the Nanchuan Block in the Sichuan Basin

Shale gas reservoirs are currently a focus in exploration and development in China. However, they exhibit pronounced vertical heterogeneity, are influenced by numerous geological and engineering parameters, and present significant challenges for “sweet spot” identification. Traditional sweet spot identification methods mainly rely on geologists’ experience and judgment regarding individual influencing parameters, which inevitably introduces subjectivity and uncertainty. The rapid development of artificial intelligence technology offers an opportunity to address this issue. This study adopts a geology–engineering integration approach and, based on data integration and a multi-algorithm prediction ensemble model with deep learning, proposes a predictive model built on actual data from the Nanchuan Block of the Sichuan Basin. The model integrates the Tetrahedral Topology Optimization (TBO) algorithm, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Geological Attribute Feature Mapping (GAFM), aiming to improve the accuracy of shale gas reservoir sweet spot identification more effectively. The results show that sweet spots are jointly influenced by geological, rock-mechanical, and hydraulic fracturing parameters. The primary reservoir property factors controlling post-fracture productivity include TOC, permeability, porosity, and gas saturation, while the main rock-mechanical controlling factors are Poisson’s ratio, Young’s modulus, brittleness index, and Bursting Pressure. Based on the analysis of these productivity-controlling factors, the proposed integrated AI learning model achieved a sweet spot identification accuracy of 88.5%, enabling precise identification of single-well sweet spot distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123853
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of ‘Geology–Engineering’ Sweet Spots in Shale Gas Reservoirs Based on the TBO-XGBoost-GAFM Model: A Case Study of the Nanchuan Block in the Sichuan Basin

Fan Zhang, Dazhi Fang, Lei Bao, Xinyu Li et al.
Processes
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Identification of ‘Geology–Engineering’ Sweet Spots in Shale Gas Reservoirs Based on the TBO-XGBoost-GAFM Model: A Case Study of the Nanchuan Block in the Sichuan Basin

Fan Zhang, Dazhi Fang, Lei Bao, Xinyu Li, Yuming Liu, Weijun Ma, Haochen Liu
article en

Abstract

Shale gas reservoirs are currently a focus in exploration and development in China. However, they exhibit pronounced vertical heterogeneity, are influenced by numerous geological and engineering parameters, and present significant challenges for “sweet spot” identification. Traditional sweet spot identification methods mainly rely on geologists’ experience and judgment regarding individual influencing parameters, which inevitably introduces subjectivity and uncertainty. The rapid development of artificial intelligence technology offers an opportunity to address this issue. This study adopts a geology–engineering integration approach and, based on data integration and a multi-algorithm prediction ensemble model with deep learning, proposes a predictive model built on actual data from the Nanchuan Block of the Sichuan Basin. The model integrates the Tetrahedral Topology Optimization (TBO) algorithm, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Geological Attribute Feature Mapping (GAFM), aiming to improve the accuracy of shale gas reservoir sweet spot identification more effectively. The results show that sweet spots are jointly influenced by geological, rock-mechanical, and hydraulic fracturing parameters. The primary reservoir property factors controlling post-fracture productivity include TOC, permeability, porosity, and gas saturation, while the main rock-mechanical controlling factors are Poisson’s ratio, Young’s modulus, brittleness index, and Bursting Pressure. Based on the analysis of these productivity-controlling factors, the proposed integrated AI learning model achieved a sweet spot identification accuracy of 88.5%, enabling precise identification of single-well sweet spot distribution.

ProcessesVol. 13(12)
Sinopec (China) (CN), Chongqing University (CN), Chongqing University of Science and Technology (CN), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.