Persistent Head Tremor Improvement in Essential Tremor Patients after Bilateral Ventral Intermediate Nucleus <scp>DBS</scp>

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. TABLE S1. STROBE statement-checklist of items for observational studies. Checklist outlining the study's adherence to the STROBE recommendations for observational studies, including item numbers, descriptions, and locations in the manuscript where each item is addressed TABLE S2. Patient characteristics and treatment parameters. This table summarizes the demographic and clinical features of the study cohort (n = 50), along with the optimized DBS stimulation parameters following surgery TABLE S3. Comparison of baseline clinical characteristics and DBS programming parameters between responders and non-responders. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as optimized DBS stimulation parameters, compared between patients with and without head tremor improvement following VIM DBS. Values are presented as median (IQR) for continuous non-normally distributed variables and mean (SD) for normally distributed variables. Categorical variables are shown as counts and percentages. Statistical tests included the Wilcoxon rank sum exact test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. P < 0.05 are bolded. DBS, deep brain stimulation; VIM, ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus; μs, microseconds; mA, milliamperes; Hz, hertz; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range TABLE S4. Predictors of head tremor improvement following VIM DBS: Exact logistic regression results. Results from exact logistic regression models assessing baseline clinical and stimulation parameters as predictors of head tremor improvement. Odds ratios (ORs) are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), along with P-values and c-statistics for model discrimination Figure S1. Flowchart of patient inclusion for testing. Diagram showing patient screening, inclusion, and exclusion for the study cohort. ET, essential tremor; PD, Parkinson's disease; FTM, Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale; DBS, deep brain stimulation; VIM, ventral-intermediate nucleus of the thalamus. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70470
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persistent Head Tremor Improvement in Essential Tremor Patients after Bilateral Ventral Intermediate Nucleus DBS

Richard Rammo, Olivia Hogue, Camila Callegari Piccinin, Sean J. Nagel et al.
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Persistent Head Tremor Improvement in Essential Tremor Patients after Bilateral Ventral Intermediate Nucleus DBS

Richard Rammo, Olivia Hogue, Camila Callegari Piccinin, Sean J. Nagel, Maxime Munyeshyaka, Saar Anis, André G. Machado, Janine Hsu, Hubert H. Fernandez, Nymisha Mandava
article en

Abstract

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. TABLE S1. STROBE statement-checklist of items for observational studies. Checklist outlining the study's adherence to the STROBE recommendations for observational studies, including item numbers, descriptions, and locations in the manuscript where each item is addressed TABLE S2. Patient characteristics and treatment parameters. This table summarizes the demographic and clinical features of the study cohort (n = 50), along with the optimized DBS stimulation parameters following surgery TABLE S3. Comparison of baseline clinical characteristics and DBS programming parameters between responders and non-responders. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as optimized DBS stimulation parameters, compared between patients with and without head tremor improvement following VIM DBS. Values are presented as median (IQR) for continuous non-normally distributed variables and mean (SD) for normally distributed variables. Categorical variables are shown as counts and percentages. Statistical tests included the Wilcoxon rank sum exact test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. P < 0.05 are bolded. DBS, deep brain stimulation; VIM, ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus; μs, microseconds; mA, milliamperes; Hz, hertz; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range TABLE S4. Predictors of head tremor improvement following VIM DBS: Exact logistic regression results. Results from exact logistic regression models assessing baseline clinical and stimulation parameters as predictors of head tremor improvement. Odds ratios (ORs) are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), along with P-values and c-statistics for model discrimination Figure S1. Flowchart of patient inclusion for testing. Diagram showing patient screening, inclusion, and exclusion for the study cohort. ET, essential tremor; PD, Parkinson's disease; FTM, Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale; DBS, deep brain stimulation; VIM, ventral-intermediate nucleus of the thalamus. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Cleveland Clinic (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), The Neurological Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.