The climate crisis and EU in the Anthropocene: May European Green Deal affect asbestos removal?

In the Anthropocene, humanity faces many questions related to the condition of our planet, as well as severely damaging effects on humans and the surrounding environment. An example of a mineral with versatile applications in daily human activities, yet which eventually revealed harmful consequences for both human health and the environment, is asbestos. Europe was, after the United States, the second region in terms of the development of the asbestos-containing products industry. The ban on asbestos use was introduced in the European Union (EU) in 2005. However, most Member States have not adopted comprehensive removal frameworks or quantified the remaining stock for systematic decontamination. We conducted a cross-national comparison of Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Belgium, evaluating six dimensions of policy readiness: statutory mandate, stock estimation, removal programs, registry/GIS coverage, dedicated funding, and health and safety measures. A comparison of the policies applied, and activities undertaken made it possible to identify a pathway for both the EU and other countries. Our analysis highlights Poland as best practice exemplar, combining clear legislative deadlines (e.g. completion of roof inventories by 2032), performance-based co-financing schemes, and centralized data infrastructures (e.g. GeoAzbest). These local decisions on policy development have a great influence on environmental change since buildings represent one of the most important sectors for final energy demand in Europe. We recommend that high-consuming Member States adopt mandatory removal timelines, establish national registers of asbestos-cement roofs, and implement tailored financial incentives such as competitive grants. Given that the EU has committed to reducing its emissions by 80%–95% by 2050, coupling asbestos removal with energy efficiency renovations will deliver co-benefits that advance both public health and climate objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Anthropocene Review
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196251399162
Primary Topic
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The climate crisis and EU in the Anthropocene: May European Green Deal affect asbestos removal?

Małgorzata Krówczyńska, Ewa Wilk
The Anthropocene Review
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
article

The climate crisis and EU in the Anthropocene: May European Green Deal affect asbestos removal?

Małgorzata Krówczyńska, Ewa Wilk
article en

Abstract

In the Anthropocene, humanity faces many questions related to the condition of our planet, as well as severely damaging effects on humans and the surrounding environment. An example of a mineral with versatile applications in daily human activities, yet which eventually revealed harmful consequences for both human health and the environment, is asbestos. Europe was, after the United States, the second region in terms of the development of the asbestos-containing products industry. The ban on asbestos use was introduced in the European Union (EU) in 2005. However, most Member States have not adopted comprehensive removal frameworks or quantified the remaining stock for systematic decontamination. We conducted a cross-national comparison of Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Belgium, evaluating six dimensions of policy readiness: statutory mandate, stock estimation, removal programs, registry/GIS coverage, dedicated funding, and health and safety measures. A comparison of the policies applied, and activities undertaken made it possible to identify a pathway for both the EU and other countries. Our analysis highlights Poland as best practice exemplar, combining clear legislative deadlines (e.g. completion of roof inventories by 2032), performance-based co-financing schemes, and centralized data infrastructures (e.g. GeoAzbest). These local decisions on policy development have a great influence on environmental change since buildings represent one of the most important sectors for final energy demand in Europe. We recommend that high-consuming Member States adopt mandatory removal timelines, establish national registers of asbestos-cement roofs, and implement tailored financial incentives such as competitive grants. Given that the EU has committed to reducing its emissions by 80%–95% by 2050, coupling asbestos removal with energy efficiency renovations will deliver co-benefits that advance both public health and climate objectives.

The Anthropocene Review
University of Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The climate crisis and EU in the Anthropocene: May European Green Deal affect asbestos removal? — Małgorzata Krówczyńska, Ewa Wilk · The Anthropocene Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS