Reducing Storage-Related Bias in Reproductive Vitamin D Research: Towards a Stable and Reliable Biomarker of Ovarian Vitamin D Status
<b>Background/Objectives:</b> One of the main reasons for discrepancies in the role of vitamin D in ART could be the measurement of the conventional biomarker 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub>. It is known that this value is affected by multiple factors, such as tissue origin, assay variability, classification criteria, and potential storage-related degradation. In this study, we investigate 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> as a new biomarker to improve vitamin D assessment in women's reproductive health, particularly regarding oocyte development. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort study including 35 oocyte donors undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation, who were recruited between October and November 2017, was conducted. Vitamin D metabolites were measured at the baseline and after seven months of storage at -80 °C. Paired serum and pooled follicular fluid (FF) samples were collected at oocyte retrieval. 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> and 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> were quantified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Statistical analyses included paired tests (serum vs. FF; baseline vs. stored) and Pearson's correlations (two-sided α = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> At the baseline, the mean serum 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> concentration was 91.56 ± 39.01 nmol/L and the mean FF concentration was 58.13 ± 19.55 nmol/L (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Serum 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> averaged 15.62 ± 10.99 nmol/L, compared with 11.26 ± 6.09 nmol/L in FF (<i>p</i> = 0.004). In both fluids, 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> and 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> were strongly correlated (serum R<sup>2</sup> = 0.92; FF R<sup>2</sup> = 0.91). Across fluids, the serum-FF correlation was stronger for 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77, <i>p</i> <0.0001) than for 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.69, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). After seven months of storage, 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> concentrations decreased significantly (serum -32%; FF -38%; both <i>p</i> < 0.0001), whereas 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> levels remained stable (serum <i>p</i> = 0.24; FF <i>p</i> = 0.36). <b>Conclusions:</b> Serum 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> is a more reliable and minimally invasive biomarker for assessing ovarian vitamin D status than the current gold standard, 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub>. Incorporating this metabolite into research studies and storage quality control may improve the reliability of retrospective analyses based on cryopreserved material, contributing to a better understanding of the role of vitamin D in human reproduction.
Authors
- Patricia Díaz-Gimeno (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0031-7545)
- Evelin E. Lara-Molina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7564-1943)
- David Amorós (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0669-5017)
- Alejandro Ballesteros (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-3498)
- Almudena Devesa-Peiró (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-3032)
- Antonio Pellicer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3316-7619)
- Jason M. Franasiak
- Patricia Sebastián-León (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-3660)
- Marina López‐Nogueroles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3114-2231)
- A. Vazquez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4249-1660)
Institutions
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- Barcelona IVI Clinic (ES)
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey (US)
- Information Visualization and Innovative Research (US)
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nutrients
- Published
- 2025-12-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17233783
- Primary Topic
- Vitamin D Research Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00