Reducing Storage-Related Bias in Reproductive Vitamin D Research: Towards a Stable and Reliable Biomarker of Ovarian Vitamin D Status

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> One of the main reasons for discrepancies in the role of vitamin D in ART could be the measurement of the conventional biomarker 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub>. It is known that this value is affected by multiple factors, such as tissue origin, assay variability, classification criteria, and potential storage-related degradation. In this study, we investigate 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> as a new biomarker to improve vitamin D assessment in women's reproductive health, particularly regarding oocyte development. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort study including 35 oocyte donors undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation, who were recruited between October and November 2017, was conducted. Vitamin D metabolites were measured at the baseline and after seven months of storage at -80 °C. Paired serum and pooled follicular fluid (FF) samples were collected at oocyte retrieval. 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> and 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> were quantified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Statistical analyses included paired tests (serum vs. FF; baseline vs. stored) and Pearson's correlations (two-sided α = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> At the baseline, the mean serum 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> concentration was 91.56 ± 39.01 nmol/L and the mean FF concentration was 58.13 ± 19.55 nmol/L (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Serum 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> averaged 15.62 ± 10.99 nmol/L, compared with 11.26 ± 6.09 nmol/L in FF (<i>p</i> = 0.004). In both fluids, 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> and 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> were strongly correlated (serum R<sup>2</sup> = 0.92; FF R<sup>2</sup> = 0.91). Across fluids, the serum-FF correlation was stronger for 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77, <i>p</i> <0.0001) than for 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.69, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). After seven months of storage, 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> concentrations decreased significantly (serum -32%; FF -38%; both <i>p</i> < 0.0001), whereas 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> levels remained stable (serum <i>p</i> = 0.24; FF <i>p</i> = 0.36). <b>Conclusions:</b> Serum 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> is a more reliable and minimally invasive biomarker for assessing ovarian vitamin D status than the current gold standard, 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub>. Incorporating this metabolite into research studies and storage quality control may improve the reliability of retrospective analyses based on cryopreserved material, contributing to a better understanding of the role of vitamin D in human reproduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17233783
Primary Topic
Vitamin D Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing Storage-Related Bias in Reproductive Vitamin D Research: Towards a Stable and Reliable Biomarker of Ovarian Vitamin D Status

Patricia Díaz-Gimeno, Evelin E. Lara-Molina, David Amorós, Alejandro Ballesteros et al.
Nutrients
Vitamin D Research Studies
article

Reducing Storage-Related Bias in Reproductive Vitamin D Research: Towards a Stable and Reliable Biomarker of Ovarian Vitamin D Status

Patricia Díaz-Gimeno, Evelin E. Lara-Molina, David Amorós, Alejandro Ballesteros, Almudena Devesa-Peiró, Antonio Pellicer, Jason M. Franasiak, Patricia Sebastián-León, Marina López‐Nogueroles, A. Vazquez
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> One of the main reasons for discrepancies in the role of vitamin D in ART could be the measurement of the conventional biomarker 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub>. It is known that this value is affected by multiple factors, such as tissue origin, assay variability, classification criteria, and potential storage-related degradation. In this study, we investigate 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> as a new biomarker to improve vitamin D assessment in women's reproductive health, particularly regarding oocyte development. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort study including 35 oocyte donors undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation, who were recruited between October and November 2017, was conducted. Vitamin D metabolites were measured at the baseline and after seven months of storage at -80 °C. Paired serum and pooled follicular fluid (FF) samples were collected at oocyte retrieval. 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> and 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> were quantified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Statistical analyses included paired tests (serum vs. FF; baseline vs. stored) and Pearson's correlations (two-sided α = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> At the baseline, the mean serum 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> concentration was 91.56 ± 39.01 nmol/L and the mean FF concentration was 58.13 ± 19.55 nmol/L (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Serum 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> averaged 15.62 ± 10.99 nmol/L, compared with 11.26 ± 6.09 nmol/L in FF (<i>p</i> = 0.004). In both fluids, 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> and 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> were strongly correlated (serum R<sup>2</sup> = 0.92; FF R<sup>2</sup> = 0.91). Across fluids, the serum-FF correlation was stronger for 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77, <i>p</i> <0.0001) than for 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.69, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). After seven months of storage, 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub> concentrations decreased significantly (serum -32%; FF -38%; both <i>p</i> < 0.0001), whereas 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> levels remained stable (serum <i>p</i> = 0.24; FF <i>p</i> = 0.36). <b>Conclusions:</b> Serum 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D<sub>3</sub> is a more reliable and minimally invasive biomarker for assessing ovarian vitamin D status than the current gold standard, 25(OH)D<sub>3</sub>. Incorporating this metabolite into research studies and storage quality control may improve the reliability of retrospective analyses based on cryopreserved material, contributing to a better understanding of the role of vitamin D in human reproduction.

NutrientsVol. 17(23)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Barcelona IVI Clinic (ES), Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey (US), Information Visualization and Innovative Research (US), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Vitamin D Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.