Toward a unified understanding of people’s aversion to nature: biophobia

Human–nature relationships are often framed positively, but research rarely addresses biophobia, the aversion to nature. However, negative relationships with nature are likely to become more widespread following societal and environmental changes, with serious implications for public health and conservation efforts. Here, we performed a systematic review of 196 studies on biophobia, revealing a fragmentation of knowledge across disciplines, including environmental sciences, psychology, and social sciences. To unify this research, we introduce a cohesive framework summarizing the drivers and consequences of, as well as treatments for, biophobia. Based on the current body of evidence, understanding changes in human–nature dynamics will require enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration, greater attention to cultural and regional differences, and longitudinal studies. In addition, we call for studies of biophobia that extend beyond animal species typically linked to fear or disgust. Broadening the scope of such research will lead to greater appreciation of the full range of human–nature interactions—from affinity to aversion—and ultimately improve conservation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70019
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a unified understanding of people’s aversion to nature: biophobia

Johan Kjellberg Jensen, Anna Sofie Persson, Masashi Soga
1 citations
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Urban Green Space and Health
1.20
article

Toward a unified understanding of people’s aversion to nature: biophobia

Johan Kjellberg Jensen, Anna Sofie Persson, Masashi Soga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Human–nature relationships are often framed positively, but research rarely addresses biophobia, the aversion to nature. However, negative relationships with nature are likely to become more widespread following societal and environmental changes, with serious implications for public health and conservation efforts. Here, we performed a systematic review of 196 studies on biophobia, revealing a fragmentation of knowledge across disciplines, including environmental sciences, psychology, and social sciences. To unify this research, we introduce a cohesive framework summarizing the drivers and consequences of, as well as treatments for, biophobia. Based on the current body of evidence, understanding changes in human–nature dynamics will require enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration, greater attention to cultural and regional differences, and longitudinal studies. In addition, we call for studies of biophobia that extend beyond animal species typically linked to fear or disgust. Broadening the scope of such research will lead to greater appreciation of the full range of human–nature interactions—from affinity to aversion—and ultimately improve conservation strategies.

Frontiers in Ecology and the EnvironmentVol. 24(1)
Lund University (SE), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Kungliga Fysiografiska Sällskapet i Lund, Sveriges Regering, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Urban Green Space and Health
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.