Comments on the non-existence of unified hoop conjecture

Abstract In a recent article, Hod (Eur Phys J C 80:982, 2020) has concluded the non-existence, heretofore unnoticed, of a unified Thorne’s hoop conjecture that holds for the quasi-local mass, $$\mathcal {M}(r\le R_{+})$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for static Reissner–Nordstrőm black hole, but does not hold for the spinning electrically charged Kerr–Newman black holes, when the same quasi-local mass is used. While the conclusion is correct and important, we wish to point out a curious exception for which the conjecture holds in a unified way for both the static and spinning tidal charged 4 d braneworld black holes of string theory, when the mass in the conjecture is the same quasi-local mass.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15116-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comments on the non-existence of unified hoop conjecture

R. N. Izmailov, Aparna Bhattacharya, R. Kh. Karimov
1 citations
The European Physical Journal C
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
1.87
article

Comments on the non-existence of unified hoop conjecture

R. N. Izmailov, Aparna Bhattacharya, R. Kh. Karimov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In a recent article, Hod (Eur Phys J C 80:982, 2020) has concluded the non-existence, heretofore unnoticed, of a unified Thorne’s hoop conjecture that holds for the quasi-local mass, $$\mathcal {M}(r\le R_{+})$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for static Reissner–Nordstrőm black hole, but does not hold for the spinning electrically charged Kerr–Newman black holes, when the same quasi-local mass is used. While the conclusion is correct and important, we wish to point out a curious exception for which the conjecture holds in a unified way for both the static and spinning tidal charged 4 d braneworld black holes of string theory, when the mass in the conjecture is the same quasi-local mass.

The European Physical Journal CVol. 85(12)
Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital (IN), Skidmore College (US), M. Akmullah Bashkir State Pedagogical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comments on the non-existence of unified hoop conjecture — R. N. Izmailov, Aparna Bhattacharya, et al. · The European Physical Journal C (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS