Update of general guidelines for statistically sound and risk‐based surveys of plant pests

Abstract At the request of the European Commission, EFSA prepared the general guidelines for surveys of plant pests, describing the legal, international and scientific context in which the surveys are designed, the basic principles implemented for surveillance of quarantine pests and introducing the concepts needed for the design of statistically sound and risk‐based surveys. Three types of specific surveys are addressed: detection surveys for substantiation of pest freedom, delimiting surveys to determine the boundaries of a potential infested zone, and monitoring surveys for prevalence estimation when measuring the effectiveness of eradication measures or for the confirmation of a low pest prevalence area. For each type of survey, the survey parameters are introduced and their interactions analysed showing the importance of the assumptions that are taken for each one of them: (i) the aims of the survey are defined as achieving a certain level of confidence of detecting a given pest prevalence (design prevalence), this reflects the trade‐off between the acceptable level of the risk and availability of resources that determine the strength of the evidence to support the conclusion of the survey; (ii) the target population is described by its structure and size, including the risk factors; and (iii) the method sensitivity is defined as the combination of the sampling effectiveness and the diagnostic sensitivity for each inspection unit. EFSA's RiPEST and RiBESS+ tools1 are introduced for calculating the sample size using the survey parameters as input values for a statistically sound and risk‐based survey design. The mathematical principles behind the tools are in line with the International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures. The survey design is flexible and can be tailored to each pest and specific situation in the Member States. Once the survey is implemented following this approach, the conclusions allow surveys to be compared across time and space, contributing to the harmonisation of surveillance activities across the EU Member States.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Supporting Publications
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2025.en-9788
Primary Topic
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Update of general guidelines for statistically sound and risk‐based surveys of plant pests

Martijn Schenk, Tomasz Kałuski, Elena Lázaro, José Cortiñas Abrahantes et al.
EFSA Supporting Publications
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
article

Update of general guidelines for statistically sound and risk‐based surveys of plant pests

Martijn Schenk, Tomasz Kałuski, Elena Lázaro, José Cortiñas Abrahantes, J. Schans, Hans‐Hermann Thulke, Juan A Navas‐Cortés, Jae-Sun Koh, Antonio Vicent Civera, Sybren Vos, Marc Aerts, Stephen Parnell, Gabriele Zancanaro, Francesco Pecori
article en

Abstract

Abstract At the request of the European Commission, EFSA prepared the general guidelines for surveys of plant pests, describing the legal, international and scientific context in which the surveys are designed, the basic principles implemented for surveillance of quarantine pests and introducing the concepts needed for the design of statistically sound and risk‐based surveys. Three types of specific surveys are addressed: detection surveys for substantiation of pest freedom, delimiting surveys to determine the boundaries of a potential infested zone, and monitoring surveys for prevalence estimation when measuring the effectiveness of eradication measures or for the confirmation of a low pest prevalence area. For each type of survey, the survey parameters are introduced and their interactions analysed showing the importance of the assumptions that are taken for each one of them: (i) the aims of the survey are defined as achieving a certain level of confidence of detecting a given pest prevalence (design prevalence), this reflects the trade‐off between the acceptable level of the risk and availability of resources that determine the strength of the evidence to support the conclusion of the survey; (ii) the target population is described by its structure and size, including the risk factors; and (iii) the method sensitivity is defined as the combination of the sampling effectiveness and the diagnostic sensitivity for each inspection unit. EFSA's RiPEST and RiBESS+ tools1 are introduced for calculating the sample size using the survey parameters as input values for a statistically sound and risk‐based survey design. The mathematical principles behind the tools are in line with the International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures. The survey design is flexible and can be tailored to each pest and specific situation in the Member States. Once the survey is implemented following this approach, the conclusions allow surveys to be compared across time and space, contributing to the harmonisation of surveillance activities across the EU Member States.

EFSA Supporting PublicationsVol. 22(12)
European Food Safety Authority
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.