Experimental Validation of the ACTIV Multi-Patient Mechanical Ventilation System

Acute respiratory distress and respiratory disease often require patients be treated with mechanical ventilation (MV) and thus place extreme demand on intensive care units (ICUs). This burden can be unsustainably high in some periods, and particularly during pandemics, such as Covid-19. In low resource regions and countries, the result can be inequity, a problem addressable via simple technological innovation. Ventilator sharing over two or more patients has been proposed but strongly discouraged because it could not treat different patient needs and hindered individual patient monitoring. However, all these approaches ventilated patients in-parallel, each breathing at the same time. A simple switching valve enables series breathing, one patient after the other. External, low-cost, and reusable sensor arrays enable individual monitoring, while low-cost adjustable pressure reducing valves allow pressure to be fully customised across two patients. This study uses an experimental test lung to experimentally demonstrate and validate the ability of such a system to balance ventilation across 2 simulated patients with very different lung compliances. A method is presented to achieve equal tidal volumes in two lungs with differing compliances of 0.10 L cmH 2 O −1 and 0.05 L cmH 2 O −1 . This goal requires driving and end-expiratory pressures of at least 20 cmH 2 O, which are clinically relatively high. The approach prioritises safety, ensuring more compliant lung is not over-ventilated during the process, reducing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The system is compatible with different ventilators, and cost-effectively fabricated in low-resource settings. Strategies addressing key safety concerns, such as cross-contamination, sterilisation, and ventilator configuration, are also presented. • A customisable control system is validated for ventilating 2 patients at once. • Bench test validated system across two very different lung compliances. • The system is fully customisable to different patient lung mechanics and needs. • A reusable active switching valve and sensor system are the only active components. • Potential to improve equity of access to care in low-resource areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC Journal of Systems and Control
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacsc.2025.100351
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Validation of the ACTIV Multi-Patient Mechanical Ventilation System

Thomas Desaive, Lui Holder-Pearson, J. Geoffrey Chase, Yeong Shiong Chiew et al.
IFAC Journal of Systems and Control
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Experimental Validation of the ACTIV Multi-Patient Mechanical Ventilation System

Thomas Desaive, Lui Holder-Pearson, J. Geoffrey Chase, Yeong Shiong Chiew, Bernard Lambermont, Geoffrey M. Shaw
article en

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress and respiratory disease often require patients be treated with mechanical ventilation (MV) and thus place extreme demand on intensive care units (ICUs). This burden can be unsustainably high in some periods, and particularly during pandemics, such as Covid-19. In low resource regions and countries, the result can be inequity, a problem addressable via simple technological innovation. Ventilator sharing over two or more patients has been proposed but strongly discouraged because it could not treat different patient needs and hindered individual patient monitoring. However, all these approaches ventilated patients in-parallel, each breathing at the same time. A simple switching valve enables series breathing, one patient after the other. External, low-cost, and reusable sensor arrays enable individual monitoring, while low-cost adjustable pressure reducing valves allow pressure to be fully customised across two patients. This study uses an experimental test lung to experimentally demonstrate and validate the ability of such a system to balance ventilation across 2 simulated patients with very different lung compliances. A method is presented to achieve equal tidal volumes in two lungs with differing compliances of 0.10 L cmH 2 O −1 and 0.05 L cmH 2 O −1 . This goal requires driving and end-expiratory pressures of at least 20 cmH 2 O, which are clinically relatively high. The approach prioritises safety, ensuring more compliant lung is not over-ventilated during the process, reducing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The system is compatible with different ventilators, and cost-effectively fabricated in low-resource settings. Strategies addressing key safety concerns, such as cross-contamination, sterilisation, and ventilator configuration, are also presented. • A customisable control system is validated for ventilating 2 patients at once. • Bench test validated system across two very different lung compliances. • The system is fully customisable to different patient lung mechanics and needs. • A reusable active switching valve and sensor system are the only active components. • Potential to improve equity of access to care in low-resource areas.

IFAC Journal of Systems and ControlVol. 35
Monash University Malaysia (MY), University of Liège (BE), University of Canterbury (NZ), Christchurch Hospital (NZ), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège (BE), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.