A Co‐Production Model for Youth Meaningful Participation in a Shifting City: Multi‐Stakeholders' Perspectives

ABSTRACT This study explored how co‐production‐based youth programs can foster meaningful participation among young people in Hong Kong, particularly in the shifting socio‐political space following Hong Kong's 2019 social movement. Drawing on Sen's Capability Approach, McMillan and Chavis' Sense of Community Framework, and Bandura's Social Learning Theory, the research employed a qualitative design involving in‐depth interviews with 24 adult stakeholders and focus group interviews with 32 Secondary 4 to 6 students. Thematic analysis revealed five key mechanisms through which co‐production cultivates meaningful participation in youth: (1) recognising youth as unique contributors, (2) creating platforms for equal collaboration and ownership, (3) fostering iterative, transparent and empathic dialogue, (4) realising co‐created ideas, and (5) providing adult facilitation. Synthesising these findings, the study proposed a three‐step framework for co‐production: Recognising youth capabilities, Building collaborative networks, and Supporting mastery through action. The model is developmentally sensitive and contextually grounded, offering practical and policy insights for enhancing youth meaningful participation in regions with shifting political landscapes such as Hong Kong.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children & Society
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.70006
Primary Topic
Youth Development and Social Support
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Co‐Production Model for Youth Meaningful Participation in a Shifting City: Multi‐Stakeholders' Perspectives

Angel Hor Yan Lai
Children & Society
Youth Development and Social Support
article

A Co‐Production Model for Youth Meaningful Participation in a Shifting City: Multi‐Stakeholders' Perspectives

Angel Hor Yan Lai
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explored how co‐production‐based youth programs can foster meaningful participation among young people in Hong Kong, particularly in the shifting socio‐political space following Hong Kong's 2019 social movement. Drawing on Sen's Capability Approach, McMillan and Chavis' Sense of Community Framework, and Bandura's Social Learning Theory, the research employed a qualitative design involving in‐depth interviews with 24 adult stakeholders and focus group interviews with 32 Secondary 4 to 6 students. Thematic analysis revealed five key mechanisms through which co‐production cultivates meaningful participation in youth: (1) recognising youth as unique contributors, (2) creating platforms for equal collaboration and ownership, (3) fostering iterative, transparent and empathic dialogue, (4) realising co‐created ideas, and (5) providing adult facilitation. Synthesising these findings, the study proposed a three‐step framework for co‐production: Recognising youth capabilities, Building collaborative networks, and Supporting mastery through action. The model is developmentally sensitive and contextually grounded, offering practical and policy insights for enhancing youth meaningful participation in regions with shifting political landscapes such as Hong Kong.

Children & Society
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Youth Development and Social Support
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Co‐Production Model for Youth Meaningful Participation in a Shifting City: Multi‐Stakeholders' Perspectives — Angel Hor Yan Lai · Children & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS