Guest editors’ introduction: Contending with gendered contradictions and blind spots in Canadian foreign policy

Despite the extensive and multisectoral scholarship on Canada's approaches to gender equity in its foreign policy, over two decades have passed since the publication of the last volume on the subject. Mindful of this gap and of retrenched state commitments to gender equity amid a return to more “traditional” diplomatic and security concerns and intransigent antagonism to justice and equity-driven agendas, contributors to this special issue analyze feminist foreign policy in Canada to assess who the policies and rhetoric benefit, how they are conceptualized, and where they are located. The contributions speak to the paradoxes of Canada's feminist foreign policy through the themes of contradictions and blind spots. Canada's renewed commitments to militarism, the instrumentalization of women's representation in the Canadian Armed Forces, and the strategic absence of feminist rhetoric in relation to the war in Ukraine demonstrate the many contradictions of Canada's approach, while explorations of disability, migration, and post-secondary education showcase its blind spots. By emphasizing these contradictions and blind spots, the scholarship in this special issue critiques the contemporary gendered realities of Canada's global policies and actions to imagine alternatives to the status quo and the potential of emancipatory and wholistic feminist foreign policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020251398109
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guest editors’ introduction: Contending with gendered contradictions and blind spots in Canadian foreign policy

Leah Sarson, Maya Eichler, Heather A. Smith, Leigh Spanner
International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

Guest editors’ introduction: Contending with gendered contradictions and blind spots in Canadian foreign policy

Leah Sarson, Maya Eichler, Heather A. Smith, Leigh Spanner
article en

Abstract

Despite the extensive and multisectoral scholarship on Canada's approaches to gender equity in its foreign policy, over two decades have passed since the publication of the last volume on the subject. Mindful of this gap and of retrenched state commitments to gender equity amid a return to more “traditional” diplomatic and security concerns and intransigent antagonism to justice and equity-driven agendas, contributors to this special issue analyze feminist foreign policy in Canada to assess who the policies and rhetoric benefit, how they are conceptualized, and where they are located. The contributions speak to the paradoxes of Canada's feminist foreign policy through the themes of contradictions and blind spots. Canada's renewed commitments to militarism, the instrumentalization of women's representation in the Canadian Armed Forces, and the strategic absence of feminist rhetoric in relation to the war in Ukraine demonstrate the many contradictions of Canada's approach, while explorations of disability, migration, and post-secondary education showcase its blind spots. By emphasizing these contradictions and blind spots, the scholarship in this special issue critiques the contemporary gendered realities of Canada's global policies and actions to imagine alternatives to the status quo and the potential of emancipatory and wholistic feminist foreign policies.

International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisVol. 80(4)
Dalhousie University (CA), University of Northern British Columbia (CA), Mount Saint Vincent University (CA), Saint Mary's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.