Strength Profile of Food 3D-Systems: Processed Cheese Technology

3D-printing is gaining more and more popularity in the dairy industry. However, no objective criteria for strength properties have been developed so far. Dairy production needs the ultimate parameters at which a finished 3D-printed dairy product retains its shape and appealing consumer properties. This study tested the strength properties of 3D-systems made from processed cheese. It established a direct correlation between the strength properties and the component composition. Processed cheese cubes of 20 mm each side were obtained from nineteen faces of round filaments with a cross-sectional area of 2 mm², melted layer by layer through an extruder. Protein proved to be the most important component in maintaining the structural and mechanical properties of 3D-systems. The qualitative composition of dairy proteins was as important as its quantity because the samples varied only in the content of skim milk powder and whey protein concentrate. As the protein content increased, the strength properties of the samples deteriorated. The optimal sample had a 1:1.8 mass fraction ratio of whey to casein protein. It exhibited the highest shear (1,831 Pa), tensile (5,885 Pa), and compressive stress (69,068 Pa) values. With increasing casein mass fraction, the strength properties deteriorated. This phenomenon indicated that whey proteins were more suitable for 3D-printing. The obtained data can serve as guidelines in calculating the stability of dairy 3D-systems in the current lack of references and standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cheesemaking and buttermaking
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21603/2073-4018-2025-4-38
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strength Profile of Food 3D-Systems: Processed Cheese Technology

E.Yu. Agarkova, С.В. Мотылев, D.M. Myalenko, V.K. Semipyatny et al.
Cheesemaking and buttermaking
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Strength Profile of Food 3D-Systems: Processed Cheese Technology

E.Yu. Agarkova, С.В. Мотылев, D.M. Myalenko, V.K. Semipyatny, Danila Arkhipov
article en

Abstract

3D-printing is gaining more and more popularity in the dairy industry. However, no objective criteria for strength properties have been developed so far. Dairy production needs the ultimate parameters at which a finished 3D-printed dairy product retains its shape and appealing consumer properties. This study tested the strength properties of 3D-systems made from processed cheese. It established a direct correlation between the strength properties and the component composition. Processed cheese cubes of 20 mm each side were obtained from nineteen faces of round filaments with a cross-sectional area of 2 mm², melted layer by layer through an extruder. Protein proved to be the most important component in maintaining the structural and mechanical properties of 3D-systems. The qualitative composition of dairy proteins was as important as its quantity because the samples varied only in the content of skim milk powder and whey protein concentrate. As the protein content increased, the strength properties of the samples deteriorated. The optimal sample had a 1:1.8 mass fraction ratio of whey to casein protein. It exhibited the highest shear (1,831 Pa), tensile (5,885 Pa), and compressive stress (69,068 Pa) values. With increasing casein mass fraction, the strength properties deteriorated. This phenomenon indicated that whey proteins were more suitable for 3D-printing. The obtained data can serve as guidelines in calculating the stability of dairy 3D-systems in the current lack of references and standards.

Cheesemaking and buttermaking
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of the Dairy Industry (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.