A systematic review of interspecific breeding in woodpeckers

Hybridization is a common phenomenon in birds. Woodpeckers (Picidae) are no exception, as approximately 20% of species are known to hybridize and, for many others, interspecific mating is suspected. However, the mechanisms and consequences (phenotypic and genetic) of hybridization are understood for only a fraction of woodpecker species. Here, we conduct a systematic review on the literature that deals with hybridization in woodpeckers and examine the available geographical and genetic data. According to the published data, most woodpeckers that hybridize inhabit the Neotropics, followed by the Nearctic and the Palaearctic. Hybridization appears to be less common in the Afrotropic and Indotropic regions. Indeed, it seems that the irregular distribution of woodpecker hybridization is determined by geo‐climatic constraints and is most likely biased by evolutionary history. As expected, hybrids are usually found among closely related congeneric pairs of species, although members of 60% of hybridizing woodpecker pairs do not seem to be closest relatives of each other. Closely related woodpeckers show similarities in their respective reproductive biology, ecology and ethology, and so had less time for genetic incompatibilities to build up. Hybridization plays a substantial role in woodpecker evolution and ecology; therefore, this phenomenon deserves further study using genomics and citizen science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ibis
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.70014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of interspecific breeding in woodpeckers

Gerard Gorman, Łukasz Kajtoch, Antonii Bakai, Jérôme Fuchs et al.
1 citations
Ibis
Genetic diversity and population structure
1.82
article

A systematic review of interspecific breeding in woodpeckers

Gerard Gorman, Łukasz Kajtoch, Antonii Bakai, Jérôme Fuchs, Dominika Sajdak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Hybridization is a common phenomenon in birds. Woodpeckers (Picidae) are no exception, as approximately 20% of species are known to hybridize and, for many others, interspecific mating is suspected. However, the mechanisms and consequences (phenotypic and genetic) of hybridization are understood for only a fraction of woodpecker species. Here, we conduct a systematic review on the literature that deals with hybridization in woodpeckers and examine the available geographical and genetic data. According to the published data, most woodpeckers that hybridize inhabit the Neotropics, followed by the Nearctic and the Palaearctic. Hybridization appears to be less common in the Afrotropic and Indotropic regions. Indeed, it seems that the irregular distribution of woodpecker hybridization is determined by geo‐climatic constraints and is most likely biased by evolutionary history. As expected, hybrids are usually found among closely related congeneric pairs of species, although members of 60% of hybridizing woodpecker pairs do not seem to be closest relatives of each other. Closely related woodpeckers show similarities in their respective reproductive biology, ecology and ethology, and so had less time for genetic incompatibilities to build up. Hybridization plays a substantial role in woodpecker evolution and ecology; therefore, this phenomenon deserves further study using genomics and citizen science.

IbisVol. 168(2)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (FR), Hungarian Meteorological Service (HU), Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Genetic diversity and population structure
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.