Residence time distribution in flow reactors for solid phase synthesis

Flow reactors for Solid phase synthesis (SPS) have gained attention, as they appear to be more efficient than the widely used stirred tanks. In either Packed Bed (PBR) or Loose Bed Reactors (LBR) configurations, the theoretical description of such platforms is limited. This study evaluates the Residence Time Distribution (RTD) for small scales (60–400 mg) of Merrifield resin (100–200 mesh) as a solid support with dichloromethane (DCM) and dimethylformamide (DMF) as solvents. For a 6.6 mm diameter column (3.0 mL total volume), we propose the tanks-in-series (TIS) model and a convolution methodology to consider the effect of inlet and outlet plungers. We assess the impacts of compaction (Δ P from 1 to 12 bar) through a Variable Bed Flow Reactor (VBFR). Our results indicate that for a PBR, increased solid support compaction broadens the RTD, indicating a higher degree of back mixing. The Kozeny-Carman equation describes the pressure increase through a packed bed in relation to the reduction in void fraction. For the LBR configuration, channeling is observed at low flow rates (DMF below 1 mL/min), and the use of a static mixer improves flow distribution. For both configurations, we present a descriptive model and a parametric analysis of the system, which is valuable for defining operational conditions. • RTD setup analyzes flow distribution in SPS reactors. • Convolution model isolates inlet/outlet effects in PBR/LBR. • Compaction widens RTD, increases back-mixing in PBRs. • Low-flow channeling in LBRs mitigated by static mixers. • Guides washing protocols to boost SPS yield and purity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.171495
Primary Topic
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Residence time distribution in flow reactors for solid phase synthesis

Wei‐Hsin Hsu, Peter H. Seeberger, José Danglad‐Flores, Matthias Kraume et al.
Chemical Engineering Journal
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
article

Residence time distribution in flow reactors for solid phase synthesis

Wei‐Hsin Hsu, Peter H. Seeberger, José Danglad‐Flores, Matthias Kraume, Dominik Ebert, Sebastián Pinzón-López, Mei Huei-Lin
article en

Abstract

Flow reactors for Solid phase synthesis (SPS) have gained attention, as they appear to be more efficient than the widely used stirred tanks. In either Packed Bed (PBR) or Loose Bed Reactors (LBR) configurations, the theoretical description of such platforms is limited. This study evaluates the Residence Time Distribution (RTD) for small scales (60–400 mg) of Merrifield resin (100–200 mesh) as a solid support with dichloromethane (DCM) and dimethylformamide (DMF) as solvents. For a 6.6 mm diameter column (3.0 mL total volume), we propose the tanks-in-series (TIS) model and a convolution methodology to consider the effect of inlet and outlet plungers. We assess the impacts of compaction (Δ P from 1 to 12 bar) through a Variable Bed Flow Reactor (VBFR). Our results indicate that for a PBR, increased solid support compaction broadens the RTD, indicating a higher degree of back mixing. The Kozeny-Carman equation describes the pressure increase through a packed bed in relation to the reduction in void fraction. For the LBR configuration, channeling is observed at low flow rates (DMF below 1 mL/min), and the use of a static mixer improves flow distribution. For both configurations, we present a descriptive model and a parametric analysis of the system, which is valuable for defining operational conditions. • RTD setup analyzes flow distribution in SPS reactors. • Convolution model isolates inlet/outlet effects in PBR/LBR. • Compaction widens RTD, increases back-mixing in PBRs. • Low-flow channeling in LBRs mitigated by static mixers. • Guides washing protocols to boost SPS yield and purity.

Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 527
Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.