Performance of multiple filter-cavity schemes for frequency-dependent squeezing in gravitational-wave detectors

Gravitational-wave detectors use state-of-the-art quantum technologies to reduce the noise induced by vacuum fluctuations, via injection of squeezed states of light. Future detectors, such as Einstein Telescope, may require the use of two filter cavities or a three-mirror coupled filter cavity to achieve a complex rotation of the squeezing ellipse, in order to reduce the quantum noise over the whole detector bandwidth. In this work, we compare the theoretical feasibility and performances of these two optical layouts and their resilience with respect to different degradation sources (optical losses, mismatching, locking precision), analytically and numerically. We extend previous analysis on squeezing degradation and find that the coupled cavity scheme provides similar or better performances than the two-cavity option, in terms of resilience with respect to imperfections and optical losses. We further highlight the role of mode-mismatch phases in limiting squeezing. Finally, we propose a possible two-step implementation scheme for Einstein Telescope using a single filter cavity that can be possibly upgraded into a coupled filter cavity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/4s4d-9mb4
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of multiple filter-cavity schemes for frequency-dependent squeezing in gravitational-wave detectors

M. Barsuglia, E. Capocasa, Fangfei Liu, J. Ding et al.
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
article

Performance of multiple filter-cavity schemes for frequency-dependent squeezing in gravitational-wave detectors

M. Barsuglia, E. Capocasa, Fangfei Liu, J. Ding, Yang Zhao, I. -L. Ahrend
article en

Abstract

Gravitational-wave detectors use state-of-the-art quantum technologies to reduce the noise induced by vacuum fluctuations, via injection of squeezed states of light. Future detectors, such as Einstein Telescope, may require the use of two filter cavities or a three-mirror coupled filter cavity to achieve a complex rotation of the squeezing ellipse, in order to reduce the quantum noise over the whole detector bandwidth. In this work, we compare the theoretical feasibility and performances of these two optical layouts and their resilience with respect to different degradation sources (optical losses, mismatching, locking precision), analytically and numerically. We extend previous analysis on squeezing degradation and find that the coupled cavity scheme provides similar or better performances than the two-cavity option, in terms of resilience with respect to imperfections and optical losses. We further highlight the role of mode-mismatch phases in limiting squeezing. Finally, we propose a possible two-step implementation scheme for Einstein Telescope using a single filter cavity that can be possibly upgraded into a coupled filter cavity.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(12)
Université Paris Cité (FR), Beijing Normal University (CN), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance of multiple filter-cavity schemes for frequency-dependent squeezing in gravitational-wave detectors — M. Barsuglia, E. Capocasa, et al. · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS