A Framework for a Culturally Sustaining “Science of Reading”

Abstract For decades, the “reading wars” have unfolded between two paradigms: a holistic, meaning‐oriented approach, and a cognitively oriented skills‐based approach. The “wars” have long complicated educational research, policy, and practice. Yet, neither the holistic nor the cognitive paradigm has historically centered strengths of linguistically and culturally diverse communities. This article uses theory‐building to explore these paradigms and illuminate the prismatic dimensions of culturally sustaining reading instruction. We propose a reconciliatory bridging framework that builds on students' and educators' strengths and lived experiences. At the crux is teachers' deep professional learning, to effectively cultivate students' linguistic and literary repertoires across and within languages, dialects, cultures, identities, and histories. Teachers' assessment literacy and multidisciplinary knowledge are key, as is greater pluralization of the social sciences. Limitations within high‐stakes accountability regimes are also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Theory
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.70069
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Framework for a Culturally Sustaining “Science of Reading”

Jeanne Sinclair, Nevra Ozoren Sener
Educational Theory
Reading and Literacy Development
article

A Framework for a Culturally Sustaining “Science of Reading”

Jeanne Sinclair, Nevra Ozoren Sener
article en

Abstract

Abstract For decades, the “reading wars” have unfolded between two paradigms: a holistic, meaning‐oriented approach, and a cognitively oriented skills‐based approach. The “wars” have long complicated educational research, policy, and practice. Yet, neither the holistic nor the cognitive paradigm has historically centered strengths of linguistically and culturally diverse communities. This article uses theory‐building to explore these paradigms and illuminate the prismatic dimensions of culturally sustaining reading instruction. We propose a reconciliatory bridging framework that builds on students' and educators' strengths and lived experiences. At the crux is teachers' deep professional learning, to effectively cultivate students' linguistic and literary repertoires across and within languages, dialects, cultures, identities, and histories. Teachers' assessment literacy and multidisciplinary knowledge are key, as is greater pluralization of the social sciences. Limitations within high‐stakes accountability regimes are also discussed.

Educational TheoryVol. 76(2)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Framework for a Culturally Sustaining “Science of Reading” — Jeanne Sinclair, Nevra Ozoren Sener · Educational Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS