How much sampling is enough? Four decades of understorey bird mist‐netting across Amazonia define the minimum effort to uncover species assemblage structure

Mist‐net sampling comprises a key methodological component of assemblage‐wide avifaunal studies, particularly in the understorey of closed‐canopy tropical forests. To investigate mist‐net bird captures and species assemblage structure, we compiled data from 312 sites across the Pan‐Amazon. Using coverage‐based rarefaction and extrapolation curves, we propose a minimum sampling effort, standardizing samples by completeness, to obtain a robust representation of local understorey bird assemblages in Amazonian forests. Furthermore, we aimed to assess the variation in capture rates across sampling days and hours, as well as to characterize species assemblages based on their ecological and morphological attributes. The sample coverage for 312 sites varied from 0.46 to 1.0. Sample size (represented by numbers of individuals) varied according to the standardized sample coverage. For sample coverage of 0.9, the sample size ranged from 30 to 271, with an average of 128.7 individuals. Species‐rich sites (>60 understorey bird species) required a larger sample size than more depauperate sites to achieve a sample coverage of 0.9. Capture success was greatest on the first day of sampling (44.8% of all individuals and 83.7% of species), and in the morning (70.8% and 96.4%). The archetypal bird sampled by understorey mist‐netting in Amazonian forests is a fairly common small‐bodied insectivore that occupies only one habitat type and spends most of its time perched above ground on shrubs or saplings. We suggest that a representative minimum sample of understorey birds should include, on average, 129 individuals per sampling unit. However, this threshold can vary according to local species richness, and we propose different sample sizes for different levels of species richness. For ecological studies where abundance data are essential to derive robust diversity estimates, we recommend operating mist‐nets from dawn to dusk. Our findings can guide future mist‐net surveys of understorey birds, optimizing resource allocation in sampling effort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ibis
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.70015
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How much sampling is enough? Four decades of understorey bird mist‐netting across Amazonia define the minimum effort to uncover species assemblage structure

Torbjørn Haugaasen, Marina Maximiano, R. G. Davies, Juliana Menger et al.
Ibis
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

How much sampling is enough? Four decades of understorey bird mist‐netting across Amazonia define the minimum effort to uncover species assemblage structure

Torbjørn Haugaasen, Marina Maximiano, R. G. Davies, Juliana Menger, Fernando H. Pereira, Sérgio Henrique Borges, Carlos A. Peres, Roberta Lúcia Boss, Marina Anciães, Ramiro Dário Melinski, Sidnei de Melo Dantas, John G. Blake, Anderson S. Bueno, Bette A. Loiselle, Pilar L. Maia‐Braga
article en

Abstract

Mist‐net sampling comprises a key methodological component of assemblage‐wide avifaunal studies, particularly in the understorey of closed‐canopy tropical forests. To investigate mist‐net bird captures and species assemblage structure, we compiled data from 312 sites across the Pan‐Amazon. Using coverage‐based rarefaction and extrapolation curves, we propose a minimum sampling effort, standardizing samples by completeness, to obtain a robust representation of local understorey bird assemblages in Amazonian forests. Furthermore, we aimed to assess the variation in capture rates across sampling days and hours, as well as to characterize species assemblages based on their ecological and morphological attributes. The sample coverage for 312 sites varied from 0.46 to 1.0. Sample size (represented by numbers of individuals) varied according to the standardized sample coverage. For sample coverage of 0.9, the sample size ranged from 30 to 271, with an average of 128.7 individuals. Species‐rich sites (>60 understorey bird species) required a larger sample size than more depauperate sites to achieve a sample coverage of 0.9. Capture success was greatest on the first day of sampling (44.8% of all individuals and 83.7% of species), and in the morning (70.8% and 96.4%). The archetypal bird sampled by understorey mist‐netting in Amazonian forests is a fairly common small‐bodied insectivore that occupies only one habitat type and spends most of its time perched above ground on shrubs or saplings. We suggest that a representative minimum sample of understorey birds should include, on average, 129 individuals per sampling unit. However, this threshold can vary according to local species richness, and we propose different sample sizes for different levels of species richness. For ecological studies where abundance data are essential to derive robust diversity estimates, we recommend operating mist‐nets from dawn to dusk. Our findings can guide future mist‐net surveys of understorey birds, optimizing resource allocation in sampling effort.

IbisVol. 168(2)
University of East Anglia (GB), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR), University of Florida (US), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (BR), Instituto Maria e Joao Aleixo (BR), Sociedade Portuguesa de Vida Selvagem (PT), Instituto Federal Farroupilha (BR), Instituto Federal do Amazonas (BR), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE), Vale Technological Institute (BR), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (BR), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (EC)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas, Norges Forskningsråd, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.