The impact of official development assistance for health on health outcomes: a rapid systematic review

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have received substantial amounts of Official Development Assistance for Health (DAH) to address domestic health funding gaps and improve access to universal healthcare. However, the effectiveness of DAH in improving health outcomes remains contested, with varying findings across studies due to differences in methodologies, data sources, and target populations. This systematic review synthesizes the existing evidence on the impact of DAH on health outcomes in LMICs, highlighting both the positive and negative effects, and identifying key mechanisms through which aid influences health. A total of 61 studies were included in the review, with a primary focus on maternal and child health outcomes. Despite methodological differences, the weight of evidence indicates a generally positive impact of DAH, particularly in countries with higher governance standards and better economic conditions. Our findings underscore the importance of contextual factors, such as governance and proximity to aid-funded projects, in shaping the effectiveness of health aid. To maximize the impact of DAH, policymakers need to strengthen donor coordination, align aid with national health priorities, and reinforce domestic health systems. Future research should focus on refining causal inference methods and exploring innovative aid-delivery mechanisms to sustain long-term health improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf102
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of official development assistance for health on health outcomes: a rapid systematic review

Marc Suhrcke, Rohan Sweeney, Sumit Mazumdar, Newton Chagoma
Health Policy and Planning
International Development and Aid
article

The impact of official development assistance for health on health outcomes: a rapid systematic review

Marc Suhrcke, Rohan Sweeney, Sumit Mazumdar, Newton Chagoma
article en

Abstract

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have received substantial amounts of Official Development Assistance for Health (DAH) to address domestic health funding gaps and improve access to universal healthcare. However, the effectiveness of DAH in improving health outcomes remains contested, with varying findings across studies due to differences in methodologies, data sources, and target populations. This systematic review synthesizes the existing evidence on the impact of DAH on health outcomes in LMICs, highlighting both the positive and negative effects, and identifying key mechanisms through which aid influences health. A total of 61 studies were included in the review, with a primary focus on maternal and child health outcomes. Despite methodological differences, the weight of evidence indicates a generally positive impact of DAH, particularly in countries with higher governance standards and better economic conditions. Our findings underscore the importance of contextual factors, such as governance and proximity to aid-funded projects, in shaping the effectiveness of health aid. To maximize the impact of DAH, policymakers need to strengthen donor coordination, align aid with national health priorities, and reinforce domestic health systems. Future research should focus on refining causal inference methods and exploring innovative aid-delivery mechanisms to sustain long-term health improvements.

Health Policy and PlanningVol. 41(3)
Monash Health (AU), Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LU), University of York (GB), Monash University (AU)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.