Marginal abatement cost analysis of cleaner power production alternatives for sustainable energy transition
Energy transition is a global transformation driven by greenhouse gas climate change in which fossil power production is replaced by fully renewable counterparts. Currently, the world has accomplished a small fraction of the energy transition. The main reason is that fossil energy sources are still abundant, cost-effective, portable, and easily implementable, while renewable sources are still technologically incipient, costly, cumbersome, portable, intermittent/seasonal, and land-intensive. Because the world cannot suddenly get rid of fossil power production, the compromise is to convert it into sustainable production by attaching carbon abatement processes (anti-carbon packages). Moreover, it is also conducive to migrating from carbon-intensive fossil power production to less carbon-intensive ones. This trend is perceptible as coal-fired plants are being replaced by natural gas combined cycles characterized by maximum thermodynamic yields and minimum carbon emitted per kWh among all fossil analogs. Thus, a conceivable next step of energy transition is to implement natural gas combined cycles with anti-carbon packages. This work compares three anti-carbon packages—post-combustion, oxy-combustion, and pre-combustion—attached to a typical natural gas combined cycle. A differential is the novel marginal abatement cost (MAC) adopted as an economic-environmental performance metric. It is shown that the post-combustion combined cycle requires the minimum investment ( 596.89 MMUSD ) and attains the maximum net value ( 2,060.68 MMUSD ) and minimum MAC ( 4.58 USD/t CO2 ), making it the best economic-environmental compromise. The oxy-combustion combined cycle attains the maximum investment ( 1,095.19 MMUSD ) and intermediary MAC ( 12.09 USD/t CO2 ) and net value ( 1,144.21 MMUSD ) but offers the best social benefit per environmental harm ( Power Exported /CO 2 Emitted = 51.63 MWh/t CO2 ). The pre-combustion combined cycle has a minimum net value ( 339.66 MMUSD ) and a maximum MAC ( 28.17 USD/t CO2 ) and is likely the worst decarbonized combined cycle according to all metrics.
Authors
- J.L. Garcı́a (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1447-3178)
- José Luiz de Medeiros (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9099-4288)
- Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4041-7161)
- Guilherme Pereira da Cunha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-3268)
Institutions
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Materials
- Published
- 2025-12-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2025.1679722
- Primary Topic
- Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00