Fusion or Confusion? Assessing the Impact of Visible‐Thermal Image Fusion for Automated Wildlife Detection

ABSTRACT Efficient wildlife monitoring methods are necessary for biodiversity conservation and management. The combination of remote sensing, aerial imagery, and deep learning offers promising opportunities to renew or improve existing survey methods. The complementary use of visible (VIS) and thermal infrared (TIR) imagery can add information compared to a single‐source image and improve results in an automated detection context. However, the alignment and fusion process can be challenging, especially since visible and thermal images usually have different fields of view (FOV) and spatial resolutions. This research presents a case study on the great blue heron ( Ardea herodias ) to evaluate the performances of synchronous aerial VIS and TIR imagery to automatically detect individuals and nests using a YOLO11n model. Two VIS–TIR fusion methods were tested and compared: an early fusion approach and a late fusion approach to determine if the addition of the TIR image gives any added value compared to a VIS‐only model. VIS and TIR images were automatically aligned using a deep learning model. A principal component analysis fusion method was applied to VIS–TIR image pairs to form the early fusion dataset. A classification and regression tree was used to process the late fusion dataset based on the detection from the VIS‐only and TIR‐only trained models. Across all classes, both late and early fusion improved the F1 score compared to the VIS‐only model. For the main class, occupied nest, the late fusion improved the F1 score from 90.2 (VIS‐only) to 93.0%. This model was also able to identify false positives from both sources with 90% recall. Although fusion methods seem to give better results, this approach comes with a limiting TIR FOV and alignment constraints that eliminate data. Using an aircraft‐mounted very high‐resolution visible sensor (wide FOV) could be an interesting compromise for operationalizing surveys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70089
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fusion or Confusion? Assessing the Impact of Visible‐Thermal Image Fusion for Automated Wildlife Detection

Samuel Foucher, Patrick Charbonneau, Jérôme Lemaître, Jérôme Théau et al.
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Fusion or Confusion? Assessing the Impact of Visible‐Thermal Image Fusion for Automated Wildlife Detection

Samuel Foucher, Patrick Charbonneau, Jérôme Lemaître, Jérôme Théau, Mathieu Varin, Camille Dionne-Pierre, Maxime Brousseau
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Efficient wildlife monitoring methods are necessary for biodiversity conservation and management. The combination of remote sensing, aerial imagery, and deep learning offers promising opportunities to renew or improve existing survey methods. The complementary use of visible (VIS) and thermal infrared (TIR) imagery can add information compared to a single‐source image and improve results in an automated detection context. However, the alignment and fusion process can be challenging, especially since visible and thermal images usually have different fields of view (FOV) and spatial resolutions. This research presents a case study on the great blue heron ( Ardea herodias ) to evaluate the performances of synchronous aerial VIS and TIR imagery to automatically detect individuals and nests using a YOLO11n model. Two VIS–TIR fusion methods were tested and compared: an early fusion approach and a late fusion approach to determine if the addition of the TIR image gives any added value compared to a VIS‐only model. VIS and TIR images were automatically aligned using a deep learning model. A principal component analysis fusion method was applied to VIS–TIR image pairs to form the early fusion dataset. A classification and regression tree was used to process the late fusion dataset based on the detection from the VIS‐only and TIR‐only trained models. Across all classes, both late and early fusion improved the F1 score compared to the VIS‐only model. For the main class, occupied nest, the late fusion improved the F1 score from 90.2 (VIS‐only) to 93.0%. This model was also able to identify false positives from both sources with 90% recall. Although fusion methods seem to give better results, this approach comes with a limiting TIR FOV and alignment constraints that eliminate data. Using an aircraft‐mounted very high‐resolution visible sensor (wide FOV) could be an interesting compromise for operationalizing surveys.

Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Cegep de Sainte Foy (CA), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (CA), McGill University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.