Minimising dolphin-induced bait depredation in a bather protection shark management program

Context The New South Wales (NSW) shark management bather protection program deploys 305 shark-management-alert-in-real-time (SMART) drumlines daily across 20 locations to catch, tag and release target sharks by using baited hooks. To optimise program effectiveness, maximising in-water fishing effort is essential. Fishing effort is reduced and program costs increased by bait depredation and false alarms, which can be caused by non-target species such as dolphins (Tursiops spp.). Bait depredation by dolphins may be reduced through operational changes to the program. Aims The effectiveness of acoustic pingers that emit sound waves to reduce bait depredation on drumlines remains unexplored, despite being used for decades on bather protection nets. Bait depredation may also be reduced by changing teleost bait to shark bait. Methods We present observational data from an operational bather protection program that used two pinger types (STM products (Dolphin dissuasive device (DDD), random 5–500 kHz, 165 decibels); and Future Oceans (Netshield, 70 kHz, 175 decibels)) off Tweed Heads in northern NSW, Australia, where bait depredation by dolphins (Tursiops spp.) was a growing issue. We also provide 3 years of operational data on bait depredation after bait was switched from teleost to shark. Key results Pingers did not appear to reduce bait depredation or visual observations of dolphin within 50 m of SMART drumlines at deployment or retrieval. However, bait depredation decreased after replacing teleost bait with shark bait. The catch rates of target sharks appeared to be maintained when using shark bait, however, the factors of season and bait type could not be separated in this data set. Conclusions Our results highlighted the challenge of mitigating bait depredation by dolphins by using pingers in bather protection programs, which rely on bait to catch target sharks, and indicated that using alternative bait may be a solution. Implications Such practicalities from the perspective of catching target sharks must also be weighed up against the other dual objective of ‘non-lethal’ programs of minimising harm to other marine life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Research
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wr25099
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimising dolphin-induced bait depredation in a bather protection shark management program

Christopher L. Lawson, Stephen Morris, Paul A. Butcher, Marcel Green
Wildlife Research
Marine animal studies overview
article

Minimising dolphin-induced bait depredation in a bather protection shark management program

Christopher L. Lawson, Stephen Morris, Paul A. Butcher, Marcel Green
article en

Abstract

Context The New South Wales (NSW) shark management bather protection program deploys 305 shark-management-alert-in-real-time (SMART) drumlines daily across 20 locations to catch, tag and release target sharks by using baited hooks. To optimise program effectiveness, maximising in-water fishing effort is essential. Fishing effort is reduced and program costs increased by bait depredation and false alarms, which can be caused by non-target species such as dolphins (Tursiops spp.). Bait depredation by dolphins may be reduced through operational changes to the program. Aims The effectiveness of acoustic pingers that emit sound waves to reduce bait depredation on drumlines remains unexplored, despite being used for decades on bather protection nets. Bait depredation may also be reduced by changing teleost bait to shark bait. Methods We present observational data from an operational bather protection program that used two pinger types (STM products (Dolphin dissuasive device (DDD), random 5–500 kHz, 165 decibels); and Future Oceans (Netshield, 70 kHz, 175 decibels)) off Tweed Heads in northern NSW, Australia, where bait depredation by dolphins (Tursiops spp.) was a growing issue. We also provide 3 years of operational data on bait depredation after bait was switched from teleost to shark. Key results Pingers did not appear to reduce bait depredation or visual observations of dolphin within 50 m of SMART drumlines at deployment or retrieval. However, bait depredation decreased after replacing teleost bait with shark bait. The catch rates of target sharks appeared to be maintained when using shark bait, however, the factors of season and bait type could not be separated in this data set. Conclusions Our results highlighted the challenge of mitigating bait depredation by dolphins by using pingers in bather protection programs, which rely on bait to catch target sharks, and indicated that using alternative bait may be a solution. Implications Such practicalities from the perspective of catching target sharks must also be weighed up against the other dual objective of ‘non-lethal’ programs of minimising harm to other marine life.

Wildlife ResearchVol. 52(12)
The University of Queensland (AU), New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU), Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (AU), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU), Southern Cross University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Marine animal studies overview
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.