Species-specific Comparison of Mammal Detection Rates between Field Surveys and Camera Trapping in Forest Areas Using the Fifth National Ecosystem Survey of South Korea

This study aimed to compare the detection rates of field surveys and camera trapping using data from forest areas within 822 survey grids of the 5th National Ecosystem Survey of South Korea (2019-2023). Detection rates for 15 mammal species were analyzed. The results showed that medium- to large-sized mammals, including <i>Capreolus pygargus, Hydropotes inermis, Sus scrofa, Nyctereutes procyonoides, Martes flavigula</i>, and <i>Meles leucurus</i> had significantly higher detection rates with camera traps. In contrast, small mammals such as <i>Prionailurus bengalensis, Mustela sibirica, Erinaceus amurensis, Lepus coreanus, Apodemus agrarius, Eutamias sibiricus, Pteromys volans aluco, Sciurus vulgaris</i>, and <i>Mogera robusta</i> exhibited low detection rates with camera traps, indicating that field surveys remain essential for monitoring these species. To improve the accuracy of mammal monitoring, a hybrid monitoring system combining field surveys and camera trapping is recommended, along with improvements in camera trap deployment. This study provides a foundation for standardizing mammal survey methodologies and supports the development of biodiversity conservation strategies in South Korea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GEO DATA
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22761/gd.2025.0032
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Species-specific Comparison of Mammal Detection Rates between Field Surveys and Camera Trapping in Forest Areas Using the Fifth National Ecosystem Survey of South Korea

Junseok Lee, Min-Sik Kim, Sang-Yeon Lee
GEO DATA
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Species-specific Comparison of Mammal Detection Rates between Field Surveys and Camera Trapping in Forest Areas Using the Fifth National Ecosystem Survey of South Korea

Junseok Lee, Min-Sik Kim, Sang-Yeon Lee
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the detection rates of field surveys and camera trapping using data from forest areas within 822 survey grids of the 5th National Ecosystem Survey of South Korea (2019-2023). Detection rates for 15 mammal species were analyzed. The results showed that medium- to large-sized mammals, including <i>Capreolus pygargus, Hydropotes inermis, Sus scrofa, Nyctereutes procyonoides, Martes flavigula</i>, and <i>Meles leucurus</i> had significantly higher detection rates with camera traps. In contrast, small mammals such as <i>Prionailurus bengalensis, Mustela sibirica, Erinaceus amurensis, Lepus coreanus, Apodemus agrarius, Eutamias sibiricus, Pteromys volans aluco, Sciurus vulgaris</i>, and <i>Mogera robusta</i> exhibited low detection rates with camera traps, indicating that field surveys remain essential for monitoring these species. To improve the accuracy of mammal monitoring, a hybrid monitoring system combining field surveys and camera trapping is recommended, along with improvements in camera trap deployment. This study provides a foundation for standardizing mammal survey methodologies and supports the development of biodiversity conservation strategies in South Korea.

GEO DATAVol. 7(4)
National Institute of Ecology (IN), National Institute of Ecology (KR)
National Institute of Ecology, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Education, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.