Do firms walk the talk: how integrated reporting quality and integrated thinking influence multiple-capital performance

Purpose The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) claims that the adoption of integrated reporting (IR) enhances the accountability and stewardship of six forms of capital. This study examines the relationship between Integrated Reporting Quality (IRQ) and the performance of these six capitals, as defined in the International <IR> Framework (IIRF) and investigates whether integrated thinking mediates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 548 firm-year observations listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE), this study employs ordinary least squares (OLS) regression techniques to estimate the research models. To address potential endogeneity in the relationship between IRQ and the performance of six types of capital, several robustness techniques are also applied. Findings We find that IRQ is positively associated with the performance of financial, intellectual, natural, human and social and relationship capitals, but negatively associated with manufactured capital performance. These findings suggest that firms with higher IRQ exhibit greater accountability and stewardship across multiple forms of capital. Furthermore, our evidence suggests that integrated thinking acts as a key mechanism through which IRQ enhances the performance of financial, natural, human and social and relationship capitals. Originality/value Our findings support the “real effects” theory view of sustainability reporting, suggesting that higher quality reporting following the International <IR> Framework (IIRF) positively affects the performance of multiple capitals, with these effects mediated by integrated thinking. The results highlight the benefits of IR, offering evidence that may encourage national and supranational regulators, policymakers and firms to adopt sustainability reporting standards issued by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), which incorporates IR principles in its framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Literature
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-09-2025-0468
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do firms walk the talk: how integrated reporting quality and integrated thinking influence multiple-capital performance

Abdus Sobhan, Sajal Kumar Dey, Sudipta Bose, Mohammed Anwaruzzaman
Journal of Accounting Literature
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Do firms walk the talk: how integrated reporting quality and integrated thinking influence multiple-capital performance

Abdus Sobhan, Sajal Kumar Dey, Sudipta Bose, Mohammed Anwaruzzaman
article en

Abstract

Purpose The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) claims that the adoption of integrated reporting (IR) enhances the accountability and stewardship of six forms of capital. This study examines the relationship between Integrated Reporting Quality (IRQ) and the performance of these six capitals, as defined in the International <IR> Framework (IIRF) and investigates whether integrated thinking mediates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 548 firm-year observations listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE), this study employs ordinary least squares (OLS) regression techniques to estimate the research models. To address potential endogeneity in the relationship between IRQ and the performance of six types of capital, several robustness techniques are also applied. Findings We find that IRQ is positively associated with the performance of financial, intellectual, natural, human and social and relationship capitals, but negatively associated with manufactured capital performance. These findings suggest that firms with higher IRQ exhibit greater accountability and stewardship across multiple forms of capital. Furthermore, our evidence suggests that integrated thinking acts as a key mechanism through which IRQ enhances the performance of financial, natural, human and social and relationship capitals. Originality/value Our findings support the “real effects” theory view of sustainability reporting, suggesting that higher quality reporting following the International <IR> Framework (IIRF) positively affects the performance of multiple capitals, with these effects mediated by integrated thinking. The results highlight the benefits of IR, offering evidence that may encourage national and supranational regulators, policymakers and firms to adopt sustainability reporting standards issued by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), which incorporates IR principles in its framework.

Journal of Accounting LiteratureVol. 47(5)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia (AU), Heriot-Watt University (GB), Heriot-Watt University Malaysia (MY), Victoria University of Bangladesh (BD), Department of Finance (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.