New Leader, New Policy? Bureaucratic Turnover and Policy Stability in China

ABSTRACT This paper examines the relationship between bureaucratic turnover and policy stability in China, arguing that the effect of promotion competition on policy choice is not static but has undergone a fundamental inversion. While the existing literature suggests competition incentivized policy innovation in the pre‐2012 era, we theorize that the logic has been inverted. Drawing on a dataset of 267 prefecture‐level cities from 2005 to 2015, we first confirm that leadership turnover significantly reduces policy stability. More importantly, our structural break analysis reveals that in the post‐2012 era of heightened political discipline, intense competition now compels officials towards policy stability as a risk‐averse strategy for career advancement. This study provides direct evidence of a temporal shift in bureaucratic incentives, refining our understanding of governance in non‐Western centralized states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Governance
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70094
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Leader, New Policy? Bureaucratic Turnover and Policy Stability in China

Zhiwei Liu
Governance
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

New Leader, New Policy? Bureaucratic Turnover and Policy Stability in China

Zhiwei Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the relationship between bureaucratic turnover and policy stability in China, arguing that the effect of promotion competition on policy choice is not static but has undergone a fundamental inversion. While the existing literature suggests competition incentivized policy innovation in the pre‐2012 era, we theorize that the logic has been inverted. Drawing on a dataset of 267 prefecture‐level cities from 2005 to 2015, we first confirm that leadership turnover significantly reduces policy stability. More importantly, our structural break analysis reveals that in the post‐2012 era of heightened political discipline, intense competition now compels officials towards policy stability as a risk‐averse strategy for career advancement. This study provides direct evidence of a temporal shift in bureaucratic incentives, refining our understanding of governance in non‐Western centralized states.

GovernanceVol. 39(1)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.