Perspectives of librarians and information specialists on conducting methodological peer reviews of systematic reviews: a mixed-methods study

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109345
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives of librarians and information specialists on conducting methodological peer reviews of systematic reviews: a mixed-methods study

Sara Schroter, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Carrie Price
BMJ Open
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Perspectives of librarians and information specialists on conducting methodological peer reviews of systematic reviews: a mixed-methods study

Sara Schroter, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Carrie Price
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
BMJ OpenVol. 15(12)
University of New Mexico (US), BioStrategies (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perspectives of librarians and information specialists on conducting methodological peer reviews of systematic reviews: a mixed-methods study — Sara Schroter, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, et al. · BMJ Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS