Local mechanical characterization of cardiovascular tissues: methods, challenges, and pathways to clinical use

Cardiovascular tissues exhibit complex mechanical behaviors that are nonlinear, anisotropic, and spatially heterogeneous. These local and regional variations play a critical role in disease initiation, progression, and treatment outcomes, yet conventional approaches often rely on specimen-averaged properties that overlook this heterogeneity. This review highlights recent advances in local mechanical characterization, spanning experimental methods, imaging-based assessments, and computational strategies. Traditional mechanical tests, such as uniaxial, biaxial, and indentation methods, remain foundational but assume uniform material properties. Surface-based techniques, particularly digital image correlation, now enable high-resolution full-field strain mapping in vitro and even intraoperatively, while volumetric approaches—including ultrasound, Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)—extend characterization to through-thickness and into in vivo settings. Digital volume correlation (DVC) further enhances these modalities by extracting three-dimensional internal displacement fields, though its use in cardiovascular tissues is still emerging. To translate these data into clinically relevant metrics, inverse methods such as the Virtual Fields Method (VFM) and inverse finite element analysis (iFEA) are used to estimate region-specific constitutive parameters. Emerging machine learning and physics-informed frameworks further accelerate model selection, parameter identification, and uncertainty quantification. Despite significant progress, major challenges remain in image quality in dynamic in vivo environments, uncertain boundary conditions, computational costs, and the lack of standardized protocols. Future progress will rely on integrating multimodal imaging, robust inverse modeling, and physics-informed machine learning into reproducible pipelines capable of generating patient-specific mechanical maps. Ultimately, local characterization holds the potential to transform risk prediction, medical device optimization, and personalized treatment planning in cardiovascular medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2025.1703081
Primary Topic
Elasticity and Material Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local mechanical characterization of cardiovascular tissues: methods, challenges, and pathways to clinical use

Dar Weiss, Dong Qiu
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
Elasticity and Material Modeling
article

Local mechanical characterization of cardiovascular tissues: methods, challenges, and pathways to clinical use

Dar Weiss, Dong Qiu
article en

Abstract

Cardiovascular tissues exhibit complex mechanical behaviors that are nonlinear, anisotropic, and spatially heterogeneous. These local and regional variations play a critical role in disease initiation, progression, and treatment outcomes, yet conventional approaches often rely on specimen-averaged properties that overlook this heterogeneity. This review highlights recent advances in local mechanical characterization, spanning experimental methods, imaging-based assessments, and computational strategies. Traditional mechanical tests, such as uniaxial, biaxial, and indentation methods, remain foundational but assume uniform material properties. Surface-based techniques, particularly digital image correlation, now enable high-resolution full-field strain mapping in vitro and even intraoperatively, while volumetric approaches—including ultrasound, Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)—extend characterization to through-thickness and into in vivo settings. Digital volume correlation (DVC) further enhances these modalities by extracting three-dimensional internal displacement fields, though its use in cardiovascular tissues is still emerging. To translate these data into clinically relevant metrics, inverse methods such as the Virtual Fields Method (VFM) and inverse finite element analysis (iFEA) are used to estimate region-specific constitutive parameters. Emerging machine learning and physics-informed frameworks further accelerate model selection, parameter identification, and uncertainty quantification. Despite significant progress, major challenges remain in image quality in dynamic in vivo environments, uncertain boundary conditions, computational costs, and the lack of standardized protocols. Future progress will rely on integrating multimodal imaging, robust inverse modeling, and physics-informed machine learning into reproducible pipelines capable of generating patient-specific mechanical maps. Ultimately, local characterization holds the potential to transform risk prediction, medical device optimization, and personalized treatment planning in cardiovascular medicine.

Frontiers in Mechanical EngineeringVol. 11
University of Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Elasticity and Material Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.