Regulatory effects of carbon and nitrogen nutrition on lipid accumulation by Yarrowia lipolytica cultivated with high-concentration volatile fatty acids
Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) derived from organic waste offer promising and cost-effective carbon sources for the production of microbial lipids. This study demonstrates the significant influence of nitrogen nutrition on cell proliferation and microbial lipid synthesis in Yarrowia lipolytica during high-concentration acid cultivation. Further investigations into nitrogen sources revealed that NH<sub>4</sub>Cl and urea are suitable options for cultivating Y. lipolytica to produce microbial lipids, resulting in lipid yields ranging from 2.00 to 2.50 g/L. Moreover, pH fluctuations were found to be influenced by both the nitrogen source and acid utilisation, with pH adaptation helping alleviate acid inhibition caused by high-concentration VFAs. Under optimised cultivation conditions, the highest yield of microbial lipids reached 4.00 g/L, accompanied by a dry cell weight of 9.91 g/L and a microbial lipid content of 40.37%, consisting predominantly of C16 ~ 18 fatty acids. These findings highlight the central role of nitrogen metabolism and pH adaptation in enhancing VFA assimilation, offering guidance for cost-effective microbial lipid production from organic waste streams.
Authors
- Guoliang Yuan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6837-6088)
- Meiyan Li
- Shikun Cheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9943-6776)
- Luiza C. Campos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2714-7358)
- Shushuang Sun
- Xuemei Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3243-2580)
- Zifu Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4489-3034)
Institutions
- CRRC (China) (CN)
- University College London (GB)
- University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
- Published
- 2025-12-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-025-03263-w
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.81