The design and evaluation of a postdoctoral mentoring programme to support the academic and professional development of NIHR Academy members

Purpose This study provides insight into the design, implementation and evaluation of a structured developmental mentoring programme, created to support the academic and professional development of postdoctoral researchers from diverse disciplines and backgrounds. The research context is the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Academy. The Academy attracts, trains and supports health and care researchers through personal or institutional career development awards, as well as training and academic career development within NIHR infrastructure, schools and capacity-building structures. The mentoring programme is open to all UK-based postdoctoral Academy members. Design/methodology/approach The approach first sets out the context, purpose and design of the mentoring programme. Second, we explore the extent to which the mentor- and mentee-defined relationship objectives were fulfilled and whether the programme met the underlying principles of the NIHR. Finally, we identified participants’ level of satisfaction with the programme. The study adopted a pragmatic multiple-method evaluation, with matched-pair mentee and mentor interviews that were thematically analysed. Findings The study found that all participants felt they met all or most of their mentoring objectives and overall programme objectives. The mentoring programme was highly valued by a diverse range of participating mentors and mentees from different health, care and research disciplines, reflective of the NIHR Academy. Research limitations/implications Limitations of this study include the short-term outcomes that participants were asked to reflect on at the end of the one-year programme; other studies may capture longer-term outcomes through longitudinal evaluation. Originality/value The study contributes to the body of knowledge regarding the benefits and organisational support that postdoctoral researchers (mentees) and their mentors receive through mentoring programme participation. This study underscores the importance and impact of a structured, formal organisational mentoring programme.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-12-2024-0139
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The design and evaluation of a postdoctoral mentoring programme to support the academic and professional development of NIHR Academy members

Sarah Howarth, Anne‐Maree Keenan, Julie Haddock-Millar, Marius Roman et al.
International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

The design and evaluation of a postdoctoral mentoring programme to support the academic and professional development of NIHR Academy members

Sarah Howarth, Anne‐Maree Keenan, Julie Haddock-Millar, Marius Roman, Hollie Birkinshaw, Kathy Tucker, Ameenat Lola Solebo, Sabrina Keating
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study provides insight into the design, implementation and evaluation of a structured developmental mentoring programme, created to support the academic and professional development of postdoctoral researchers from diverse disciplines and backgrounds. The research context is the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Academy. The Academy attracts, trains and supports health and care researchers through personal or institutional career development awards, as well as training and academic career development within NIHR infrastructure, schools and capacity-building structures. The mentoring programme is open to all UK-based postdoctoral Academy members. Design/methodology/approach The approach first sets out the context, purpose and design of the mentoring programme. Second, we explore the extent to which the mentor- and mentee-defined relationship objectives were fulfilled and whether the programme met the underlying principles of the NIHR. Finally, we identified participants’ level of satisfaction with the programme. The study adopted a pragmatic multiple-method evaluation, with matched-pair mentee and mentor interviews that were thematically analysed. Findings The study found that all participants felt they met all or most of their mentoring objectives and overall programme objectives. The mentoring programme was highly valued by a diverse range of participating mentors and mentees from different health, care and research disciplines, reflective of the NIHR Academy. Research limitations/implications Limitations of this study include the short-term outcomes that participants were asked to reflect on at the end of the one-year programme; other studies may capture longer-term outcomes through longitudinal evaluation. Originality/value The study contributes to the body of knowledge regarding the benefits and organisational support that postdoctoral researchers (mentees) and their mentors receive through mentoring programme participation. This study underscores the importance and impact of a structured, formal organisational mentoring programme.

International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in EducationVol. 15(1)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Leicester (GB), University of Oxford (GB), NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit (GB), Institute of Child Health (IN), NIHR Research Delivery Network (GB), University College London (GB), Middlesex University London (GB), National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (JP), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.